Internal Migration, Social Exclusion, and Victimization

DOI10.1177/0022427816676861
Date01 July 2017
Published date01 July 2017
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Internal Migration,
Social Exclusion,
and Victimization:
An Analysis of Chinese
Rural-to-Urban Migrants
Hua Zhong
1
, Jianhua Xu
2
, and Alex R. Piquero
3
Abstract
Objectives: This article applies a multidimensional social exclusion frame-
work to examine Chinese rura l-to-urban migrant vict imization. Method:
Data from the 2012 China Labor Dynamics Survey is used to examine
whether Chinese migrants are more likely to be victimized compared to
urban residentsand to what extent the prior findings on the meditatingroles
of social exclusion between immigration and victimization can be applied to
understand Chinese migrants’ victimization. Results: Findings reveal the ele-
vated victimization risks among nationwide rural-to-urban migrants.
Logistic regression models find that social exclusion mediates the link
between migrant status and victimization and that social exclusion predicts
victimization. Conclusions: The discriminative institutional arrangements in
China are a major force of the universal disadvantages of Chinese migrants.
That is, it is not the migrant status itself, but the social exclusion suffered
by individuals that increase the likelihood of being criminally victimized.
1
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
2
University of Macau, Macau, Macao
3
The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
Corresponding Author:
Hua Zhong, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 437 Sino Building, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Email: sarazhong@cuhk.edu.hk
Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency
2017, Vol. 54(4) 479-514
ªThe Author(s) 2016
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0022427816676861
journals.sagepub.com/home/jrc
Keywords
social exclusion, migration, victimization, China
There is an abundant literature examining the vulnerability of international
immigrants in Western soc ieties in terms of their hi gh risk of criminal
victimization (Zatz and Smith 2012; though see Kubrin and Desmond
2015). The high victimization rate experienced by immigrants is believed
to be one of the consequences of the multidimensional social exclusion (i.e.,
social rejection and spatial segregation) they suffer from receiving societies
(Fussell 2011; Sulkowski et al. 2014; Venkatesh 2008 ). However, there
remains a lack of research concerning the link between internal migration
and criminal victimization.
ThelackofresearchonthistopicamongWesternscholarsmightreflect
the nearly complete urbanization of their countries. For example, in the
United States, internal migration reached an inflection point in the 1980s,
subsequently declining (Molloy, Smith, and Wozniak 2011). Unlike
Western developed countries, large-scale internal migration in many
developing countries is ongoing, and internal migration massively
outnumbers transnational immigration in the current world (Bell and
Charles-Edwards 2013). In particular, many developing societies are now
experiencing large-scale urbanization and facing various crime and
victimization problems in this process, such as Turkey, India, Vietnam,
and China (Kusuma, Pandav, and Babu 2014; Nguyen et al. 2012; Sercan
et al. 2015; Xu 2014). More studies are needed to examine whether the-
ories and findings on international immigrants and criminal victimization
from Western societies can be applied to explain the pattern of victimiza-
tion for internal migrants in non-Western contexts, and China offers one
intriguing case study.
In 2015, China had 269 million rural-to-urban migrants, a popula-
tion almost the same size as the U.S. population. Along with its rapid
modernization and urbanization, almost all types of crime have drama-
tically increased over the past several decades (Bakken 2005; Liu
2006). Researchers in China have often argued that the influx of rural
migrants in cities is a main reason for this escalation (Ma 2001; Wang
2002). However, scholars and the public have long neglected to con-
sider that migrants also frequently experience victimization (Cheung
2013; Xu and Song 2005). More recently, researchers have paid closer
attention to the vulnerability of Chinese rural-to-urban migrants as
they are one of the most disadvantaged social groups in contemporary
480 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 54(4)
China (Pun 2005; Siu 2015). These internal migrants have been
regarded as foreigners and second-class citizens in their own country
(Solinger 1999) due to institutional discrimination and multidimen-
sional social exclusion (Xu 2014). An interesting and unaddressed
question, then, is whether China’s internal migrants face similar dis-
advantages in criminal victimization like international immigrants in
developed countries.
Although various victimization-related surveys, including the 1994
Beijing Household Victimizat ion Survey, the 2004 Tianjin Househ old
Victimization Survey, and the Annual National Public Security Survey
(conducted by the Chinese Statistics Bureau since 2001), have been con-
ducted in China, these surveys have generally neglected the victimization
experience and the preventive/risk factors among migrant workers. Inter-
nal migrants have been systemat ically excluded from researc h due to
their lack of official Hukou, or household registration system, in urban
China, a type of information all samplings relied on in previous surveys.
Although some research attempted to address the problem of migrant
victimization and the social exclusion they experienced in urban China
theoretically, data limitations have not allowed for a large-scale empirical
examination due to methodological and political challenges (Xu 2016),
until Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU) in Guangdong began to conduct the
China Labor Dynamic Survey (CLDS) in 2012. Not only did the survey
apply advanced Geographic In formation System (GIS) sampl ing tech-
niques to survey migrant workers so that their sample would be nation-
ally representative, but importantly the survey also included a series of
vulnerability questions, including respondents’ victimization history and
deviant behaviors.
Using these data, the current study presents the first nationally repre-
sentative examination of victimization and its social correlates among
Chinese rural-to-urban migrants. Specifically, we explore (1) whether
there is higher risk of victimization among rural-to-urban migrants com-
pared to urban residents in China, and (2) if so, to what extent the prior
research findings on the mediating effects of social exclusion between
international immigration and victimization can be applied in the non-
West context of China. In so doing, results from the current study will
extend the nascent knowledge base by permitting a rigorous exploration of
the patterns and correlates of migrants’ victimization in China. Before we
turn to the results of our investigation, we provide an overview of the
theoretical and prior research issues on victimization and then within the
Chinese context.
Zhong et al. 481

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT