Intensive and extensive margins of exports: What can India learn from China?

AuthorChoorikkad Veeramani,Prachi Gupta,Lakshmi Aerath
Published date01 May 2018
Date01 May 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12592
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Intensive and extensive margins of exports: What
can India learn from China?
Choorikkad Veeramani
1
|
Lakshmi Aerath
1
|
Prachi Gupta
2
1
Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India
2
Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan
1
|
INTRODUCTION
As part of a major economic reform programme aimed at improving external competitiveness,
Indias trade and exchange rate policies were liberalised and restructured since the early 1990s.
How did exports respond to changes in the incentive structure engendered by the reforms?
While Indias merchandise exports in dollar terms grew moderately at about 9.7% per year dur-
ing the first decade of economic reforms (19912000), the period from 2001 to 2012 stands
apart for its strong growth rate of 20.4% per annum (see Table 1). Data for the more recent
years, however, indicate that merchandise exports plummeted from $315 billion in 2013 to
$267 billion in 2015 with a negative annual growth rate of 7.9% per annum. Further, through-
out the post-reform period, Indias merchandise imports have grown faster than merchandise
exports resulting in increasing trade deficits.
1
The need for accelerated export growth has gained renewed policy attention with the
recent launch of Make in Indiacampaign by IndiasPrimeMinister.
2
An important ques-
tion, in this context, is: What type of policy interventions would help achieve f aster export
growth? The answer depends primarily upon whether export growth is to be targeted along
the extensive margin (i.e., creation of new trading relationships) or the intensive margin (i.e.,
strengthening of existing trade relationships).
3
The intensive margin of a countrys export
growth is attributed to its persistent export relationshipsthat is, exports of already exported
products (old products) to already existing market destinations for those products (old
1
During the period 200115, while Indias merchandise exports recorded a growth rate of 16.4% per annum, imports grew
at the rate of 18.5% per annum. In 201415, for instance, the merchandise trade account showed a deficit of $145 billion,
of which about $118 billion was offset by invisible earnings, leaving a current account deficit of $27 billion, or 1.3% of
GDP (Source: Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy, Reserve Bank of India).
2
The Make in Indiacampaign aims to transform India into a global manufacturing powerhouse by promoting exports,
encouraging foreign direct investment (FDI), improving industrial productivity and lowering the barriers to doing business.
For details, see the Make in Indiaportal (http://www.makeinindia.com/home).
3
Studies by Evenett and Venables (2002) and Hummels and Klenow (2005) find that exploitation of trading opportunities
along extensive margin is more important than intensive margin for achieving faster export growth. However, more recent
studies like Felbermayr and Kohler (2006), Eaton, Eslava, Kugler, and Tybout (2008), Helpman, Melitz, and Rubinstein
(2008), Amiti and Freund (2010) and Besedes and Prusa (2011) conclude that intensive margin plays the dominant role in
determining export success.
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12592
1196
|
©2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/twec World Econ. 2018;41:11961222.
markets). The extensive margin, on the other hand, refers to changes in the value of exports
due to diversification of old products to new market destinations and/or due to exports of
completely new products.
What has been the relative contribution of extensive and intensive margins to Indias export
growth during the recent past? How does Indias performance compare with that of other large
exporting countries like China? In this paper, we decompose Indias export performance in manu-
factured products during 200015 into changes at the intensive and extensive margins.
4
Intensive
margin is further decomposed into price and quantity margins. To provide a comparative perspec-
tive, Indias export performance along the different margins is compared and contrasted with that
of China. China is a natural choice for comparison in light of its spectacular growth of manufac-
tured exports in recent decades and given its similarities with India in terms of size, stage of devel-
opment and relative resource endowments.
Our decomposition results show that while China outperforms India at both the margins, the
gap between the two countries is particularly wide at the intensive margin. What are the factors
that explain Chinas superior performance relative to India at the different margins of exports? It is
often argued that China has been artificially devaluing its currency as a means to boost exports.
Another often heard explanation is that inward FDI flows have contributed significantly to Chinas
export growth. We examine different explanations for Chinas superior performance relative to
India, including those related to exchange rate and FDI inflows, with the help of a gravity model
estimated for the period 200015.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 sets a background by providing a brief
description of export performance of India and China under trade liberalisation. Section 3 details
the method and data used for the decomposition of exports into various margins. Section 4 dis-
cusses the decomposition results for the two countries. Section 5 outlines the methodology, data
and variables used in the regression analysis. Regression results are discussed in Section 6. Sec-
tion 7 provides the concluding remarks.
TABLE 1 Average annual growth rates of merchandise exports
Period India China World
195070 2.49 6.29 7.37
197180 17.71 18.99 20.27
198190 8.24 13.22 7.20
19912000 9.72 14.07 6.93
200112 20.35 20.33 10.77
201315 7.89 1.48 6.73
200115 16.38 16.85 8.43
Note: Growth rates are computed using semi-logarithmic regressions.
Source: Authors estimation using data from WTO.
4
Export growth of several East Asian countries, including China, has been driven by the manufacturing sector. The experi-
ences of these countries also suggest that export-led growth of manufacturing sector is crucially important for sustained
employment generation and poverty reduction. These observations motivate our focus on manufactured export performance.
VEERAMANI ET AL.
|
1197

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT