Intellectual Property Is the Foundation of Value

AuthorRussell L. Parr
ProfessionPresident of Intellectual Property Research Associates
Pages3-19
CHAPTER 1
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
IS THE FOUNDATION
OF VALUE
Intellectual property rst entered the lexicon of the general U.S. population in 1993.
Late-night talk-show host David Letterman did not get the nod from NBC to replace
retiring Johnny Carson at The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. David Letterman’s rival,
Jay Leno, got the job. Letterman went to CBS to host a new late show to compete with The
Tonight Show. NBC threatened to sue Letterman if he used any of his regular running gags
such as “The Top Ten List,” “Stupid Pet Tricks,” and “Viewer Mail,” developed while
Letterman was at NBC. The Los Angeles Times reported, “NBC’s position is that, under
‘intellectual property’ laws, it owns the rights to Late Night with David Letterman and
elementsinthe show....
1
The general public was aware of the elements of intellectual property such as patents
and trademarks but not the collective term intellectual property, which was largelylimited
to professionals specically operating in the eld of intellectual property.
This book is about intellectual property: patented technology, trademarks, copyrights,
and trade secrets. It describes the methods for valuing intellectual property and the practices
of monetizing intellectual property, including licensing and royalty rates. It also spends
considerable space on the determination of patent infringement damages.
This book also is about intangible assets that in conjunction with intellectual property
create value in a business enterprise. Intangibles are categorized as rights and relationships.
Examples of rights include licenses, contracts, and leasehold interest. Examples of rela-
tionships include an assembled workforce and distribution network. Their value can be
substantial and will be discussed.
The reason for this book is that intellectual property is the central resource for creating
wealth in almost all industries.
Patents conveyexclusive rights to inventors for their innovations.The government allows
a patent owner to exclude all others from using a protected invention for 20 years after
ling for a patent. During the life of a patent, its owner can commercially exploit the patent
invention, license it to others, sell it, or “park” it—not use it and keep all others from using
it, too.
Patents encourage and protect the billions of dollars invested in the development of
new products. Consider breakthrough medical therapies. It costs $2.5 billion to get a new
1http://articles.latimes.com/1993–08–30/entertainment/ca-29527_1_stupid-pet-tricks
3
4 Ch. 1 Intellectual Property Is the Foundation of Value
drug from the laboratory, through development, and through FDA approval.2This massive
investment would never be spent without patent protection. No company would invest this
kind of money in developing a new drug if, after successfully entering the market, anyother
company could market a copy of the new drug. Patents protect investorsby providing them
with an exclusive period of time during which the investor can recover its huge investment
and make a prot. In return for the limited exclusivity provided by a patent, at the end of a
patent’s life, the invention enters the public domain, free for all others to use.
Trademarks convey the messages of value, quality, and safety for coveted products and
services to trusting consumers. These assets are often nurtured over decades of exposure to
the public and enormous support from advertising. By the end of 2017, over $200 billion in
annual media ad spending will support the recognition of trademarks.3Forbes reports the
value of the Google trademark at over $44 billion.4
Think about the single aspect of safety conveyed by a trademark. A thirsty consumer
is interested in buying an amber-colored, sugary carbonated drink. He faces two options.
One is in a dirty glass bottle with an unknown brand name scrawled across the bottle with
a grease pen. The other drink is presented in a gleaming bottle with Pepsi expertly printed
on the bottle. Even though the Pepsi option is more expensive, the decision is obvious for
those desiring a thirst-quenching experience without the risk of poisoning.
Trademarks also provide a consumer with cachet. Cars are a great example. Most cars
produced today can get anyone from point A to point B reliably and safely. BMW and
Mercedes, however,propel their owners with widespread respect and admiration. Enormous
premiums are paid for such attributes.
Copyrights for the entertainment industry protect the creativity that goes into music,
movies, art, and literature. Congress protects copyright owners as reward for their cre-
ativity. Like patents, time and money are required to create art, and the intangible benets
for society for entertainment and amusement are considered worthy of exclusive rights.
Consider comic books. Disney purchased the rights to comic book characters like Iron
Man, the Hulk, the Fantastic Four, the X-Men, and Spider-Man when it purchased Marvel
for $4 billion. Movies, theme parks, and merchandising of the superheroes have earned
Disney billions of dollars annually.
Trade secret lawsprotect sensitive manufacturing, services, and marketing activities vital
to many companies; think of the formula for Coke. Like patents, the development of trade
secrets can be costly. Unlike patents, trade secrets rights do not expire. If the trade secret
can be maintained as a secret, the initial investment can be enjoyed into perpetuity. The
value of all the trade secrets in the world can never be known, butthis book will teach how
specic trade secrets can be valued.
FOUNDATION OF VALUE CREATION
The United States Patent and Trademark Ofce conducted a study to estimate the impact
of intellectual property (IP) on the economy. It identied IP-intensive companies as those
using signicant amounts of patents, trademarks, and copyrights. The report concluded that
IP-intensive industries supported 45.5 million jobs and contributed $6.6 trillion in value
added in 2014, equivalent to 38.2% of U.S. GDP. The study also reported on the impact of
IP in Europe.5
2http://www.scienticamerican.com/article/cost-to-develop-new-pharmaceutical-drug-now-exceeds-2–5b/
3http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Digital-Ad-Spending- Surpass-TV-Next-Year/1013671
4http://www.forbes.com/sites/seanstoneeld/2011/06/15/the-10- most-valuable-trademarks/2/#cc4f4f52c5c6
5“Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy,” 2016 Update, USPTO.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT