Information and communication technology use among children separated from one or both parents: A scoping review
Published date | 01 April 2023 |
Author | Amandine Baude,Gaël Henaff,Émilie Potin,Audrey Bourassa,Marie‐Christine Saint‐Jacques,Julie Noël |
Date | 01 April 2023 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12831 |
RESEARCH
Information and communication technology use
among children separated from one or both parents:
A scoping review
Amandine Baude
1
|Gaël Henaff
2
|
Emilie Potin
2
|
Audrey Bourassa
3
|Marie-Christine Saint-Jacques
3
|Julie Noël
4
1
Laboratoire de Psychologie Labpsy,
Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
2
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche sur
les innovations soci
Etales, University of
Rennes, Rennes, France
3
Department of Social Work, Laval
University, Quebec, Canada
4
Department of Social Work, Sherbrooke
University, Quebec, Canada
Correspondence
Amandine Baude, Facult
E de Psychologie,
Laboratoire de Psychologie LabPsy,
Universit
E de Bordeaux, 3 ter, Place de la
Victoire, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
Email: amandine.baude.1@ulaval.ca
Abstract
Background: The development and diversification of infor-
mation and communication technology (ICT) are chang-
ing the way family members communicate with each
other, creating new opportunities for interaction. When
children and parents do not live together on a day-to-day
basis, these technologies may represent privileged means
to keep in touch and maintain a relationship.
Objective: This article aims to review the literature on the
use of ICT among children separated from one or both
parents, paying particular attention to two contexts:
parental separation and foster care.
Method: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey
and O’Malley (2005) framework and the PRISMA Exten-
sion for Scoping Reviews guidelines (Tricco et al., 2018).
The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: Of the 847 references identified, 11 were selected
(six related to parental separation and five related to foster
care). The literature dated from 1997 to 2020 and was par-
ticularly sparse and heterogeneous (e.g., the definition of
ICT and characteristics of participants). Three topics
emerged: (a) ICT practices and usage patterns, (b) ICT
practices: opportunities and issues, and (c) sociolegal sup-
port issues.
Implication: This study highlights the need for all legal and
psychosocial actors to consider the place of digital technol-
ogy in family relationships.
KEYWORDS
foster care, information and communication technologies, parent–child
contact, parental separation, scoping review
Received: 31 May 2022Revised: 17 December 2022Accepted: 17 December 2022
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12831
© 2023 National Council on Family Relations.
Family Relations. 2023;72:601–620. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/fare 601
Information and communications technologies (ICT) is an umbrella term that refers to the tech-
nological tools—from hardware to software—used to communicate, share information, and
maintain social relationships. About 30 years ago, face-to-face, mail, or landline telephone were
the primary modes of communication (Carvalho et al., 2015). Then, in the late 1990s and early
2000s, we witnessed the rise of email and mobile telephony (limited to calling and texting capa-
bilities). A few years later, the Internet and social networks (e.g., Instagram, TikTok, Twitter,
and Facebook) gained popularity. Today, the emergence and democratization of new hardware
technologies, such as smartphones and tablets, offer access to the Internet anytime and
anywhere.
Today’s young people have grown up in a digital world and spend considerable time online,
earning them the nickname “digital natives”(Prensky, 2001). According to the Pew Research
Internet Center, 95% of United States adolescents owned or had access to a smartphone in 2018
(Anderson & Jiang, 2018). A similar picture is emerging in Europe, as well as in Canada
(Bourget et al., 2020; Suter et al., 2018). The development and diversification of ICTs have
impacted not only the young people’s lives but also their families by creating new opportunities
for interaction.
Although a variety of communication tools appear now easily accessible, research on the
use of ICT by children separated from one or both parents remains scarce. However, many
questions have been raised about the effectiveness of virtual communication after child place-
ment or parental separation and how ICT can best be used to support the maintenance of fam-
ily relationships (Birnbaum, 2020; Sage & Jackson, 2022).
BACKGROUND
In Western countries, a significant proportion of young people (children and adolescents) do
not spend their daily lives with their father or mother (Lapinte & Buisson, 2017; Statistics
Canada, 2016). They live with their other parent, a family member or in foster care part of the
time. These living arrangements are either because they have been placed in care by child pro-
tection services or because they live with the custodial parent after a parental separation.
From a sociolegal perspective, maintaining the parent–child relationship after placement or
parental separation is a major challenge (Baude et al., 2016; Potin, Henaff, & Trellu, 2018) and
often involves face-to-face contact, whether supervised or unsupervised (Sen, 2018; Simpson,
2019). In-person parent–child contact is key to preserving the child’s connection to family post-
separation (Elam et al., 2019) and is especially crucial in the case of children in foster care
whose permanency plan is to return to the family home (Blakeslee & Best, 2019; McWey &
Cui, 2017). To bridge the gap created by separation between children and their parent(s), ICTs
also offer young people a new way to keep in touch with their parent(s). Using such communi-
cation tools may have risen over the past 2 years owing to the COVID-19 health crisis and mea-
sures implemented by authorities to restrict or even prohibit movement and contact between
people (Lessard, 2020; Sistovaris et al., 2020). In Québec, for example, the Minister of Health
and Social Services signed a Ministerial Order temporarily suspending the access rights of par-
ents with children in foster care (Marin, 2020). At the same time, the government encouraged
child protection services and foster families to implement other means of maintaining parent–
child contact, primarily via ICT (Collings et al., 2020; Singer & Brodzinsky, 2020).
The growth of virtual communication raises important questions regarding the continuity
and quality of parent–child relationships, children’s well-being and separation or placement
arrangements (Macdonald et al., 2017; Saini et al., 2013; Simpson, 2019). Factors found to sup-
port ICT use in foster care or parental separation situations include many young people’s desire
to maintain ties with their parents, even if they have vulnerabilities (Beaudry et al., 2004; Potin,
Henaff, Trellu, & Sorin, 2018). In formal arrangements where contact is normally scheduled in
602 FAMILY RELATIONS
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
