Index

AuthorJim Wren/Laura Brown
Pages587-604
I-1
INDEX
INDEX
A
Abusive language
Closing argument, §18:66
Accountants
Expert witnesses, §7:53
Active listening
Generally, §4:22
Psychodrama and, §4:21
Acute concussion evaluation (ACE)
Mild traumatic brain injury, §21:12
Admission requests
Discovery checklist, use of, §10:06
Setting up damage issues with, §10:41
Aged persons
Wrongful death cases, closing argument in,
§18:36
Anchoring the jury
Damage range during voir dire, §14:32
Anger
Finding the basis for, §10:40
Motivational, as, §§1:62, 17:21
Visuals depicting, §11:53
Appearance/dress
Demeanor. See Demeanor
Jury, dressing appropriately for, §2:47
“Assimilation” tendency
Jury, §1:89
Attorneys
Challenges, facing and handling, §§1:02,
1:03
Closing argument. See Closing argument
Contingent fees, §14:58
Faking it, §§1:12, 2:10
Fear about the “damages” topic
how fear reveals itself, §§1:10–1:12

Opening statement. See Opening statement
Psychodrama “role playing.” See
Psychodrama
Tentativeness of, §1:41
Voir dire
client referred to doctor by lawyer,
§14:59
contingent fees, §14:58
“Availability” bias
Jury, §1:83
B
Belief perseverance
Jury, §§1:41, 1:81
Bench brief
Economic loss rule, Form 13–1
Biases and prejudices
Jurors. See Jury
Wealth of party, references to, §20:91

Jury, §1:55
Blood-based biomarkers
Mild traumatic brain injury, §21:50
Brain electrical activity mapping (BEAM)
Mild traumatic brain injury, §21:39
Brain injury
Closing argument, §18:38
Incidence of, §21:03
MTBI. See Mild traumatic brain injury
(mTBI)
Brain science
Teaching to jurors, §21:02
Understanding, importance of, §21:01
Burden of proof
Opening statement, explaining in, §15:53
Weak explanations of, §2:22
Business damage cases
Generally, §5:40
Book value, §6:21

Comparable properties valuation method,
§6:25

future earnings), §6:24
Discounts, §6:26
Proving Damages to the Jury I-2
INDEX
Experts, §7:54. See also Business damage
experts
Initial client meeting, §5:43
Loss damage models. See Business loss
damage model
See 
“Multiple of book” model, §6:22
“Multiple of earnings” model, §6:22
Overview of valuation methods, §6:20

Premiums, §6:26
Questionnaires, §5:42, Form 5–3
Sample initial damage model, §5:44
Business damage experts
Business valuations, §8:92
Checklist of documents to be compiled for,
Form 8–4

Methodology for measuring damages, §8:90
Business loss damage model
Generally, §6:50
Assembling, §§6:50–6:52
Evaluation method, §6:52
Type of loss, §6:51
C
Candor
Credibility with jury, §§2:30–2:35
Defendant’s dishonesty, §19:32
Lack of belief, jurors looking, §2:11
Challenges for cause
Voir dire, §§14:80–14:83; Form 14–5
Charge to jury. See Jury instructions
Children
Closing argument
injury to child, §18:33
loss of child, §18:32
Consortium, loss of, §20:74
Clients
Consortium, instructing on meaning of,
§20:72
Depositions, preparation for, §10:31
Direct examination
“Exhibit A,” client as, §16:46
questioning primary client, §§16:60,
16:61
starting witnesses, clients as, §16:51
Family of. See Family
Initial meeting with
generally, §5:09
business injury cases, §5:43
employment cases, §5:63
personal injury cases, §5:22
phone screenings. See Phone screen-
ings (initial)
wrongful death cases, §5:32
Knowing, §11:50
Phone screenings. See Phone screenings
(initial)
Psychodrama in communicating with, §4:40
Visiting, §10:23
Clinical psychologists
Expert witnesses, §7:41
Clinicians
Expert witnesses, §7:44. See also 
clinician
Closing argument
Abusive language, §18:66
Admissibility issues, §§18:60–18:66
Age, adjustments for, §18:08
Amount claimed/expected, reference to,
§18:62
“Apology” defense tactic, §18:51
Brain injury, §18:38
Children
injury to child, §18:33
loss of child, §18:32
Close calls on damages, §18:44
Collateral sources, §18:56, §23:30
Commitment of jurors, obtaining,
§§18:01–18:08
Connective tissue injury, §18:39
Consortium, loss of, §18:31
Defense themes, counters to, §§18:50–18:56

Duration of, §18:20
Earning capacity, §18:42
Elderly, death of, §18:36
Fear, appeals to, §18:65
Future damages, §18:41
General principles of, §§18:01–18:08
Golden rule argument, §18:61
Income tax consequences, §18:64

Intangible damages, §§18:01, 18:06
“Just economic damages only” defense argu-
ment, §18:53
Life care plans, §18:43
Lost earnings, §18:42
Lottery and greed vs. reasonableness and
fairness, §18:55

argument, §18:52
Organization of, §§18:20, 18:21
Pain, §18:37
Parent, loss of, §18:35
Passion, engaging jurors with, §18:07

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT