Index

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7863(2012)0000013017
• Pages: 253-256
• Published date: 21 May 2012
• Date: 21 May 2012

INDEX

adversary evaluation, 9

accreditation, 145–147, 167

accreditation criteria, 146–147

always okay, 151

arrest, 105, 110–111, 121, 184–186,

188

behaviour therapy, 29–30

black box, 19, 129, 233

calliper matching, 190–191

Campbell’s law, 14

case-based analysis, 133, 138

change, 7–8, 14, 16–18, 21, 30,

49–50, 58–59, 62, 74–75, 77–78,

96, 102, 104, 108, 114, 129–130,

137, 145–167, 175, 179–181,

205, 208, 212–213, 216–217,

219, 223, 225–227, 243

CIPP model, 9

clinical signif‌icance, 148–149, 152,

159, 163, 167

cognitive-behavioural therapy, 33,

74, 213

cognitive distortions, 30, 72, 78,

152–154, 158

cohesion, 38, 152, 164

Community Order study, 136, 138

community sentences, 136, 201, 214,

216

connoisseurship and criticism, 10

constructivism, 8

core correctional practices, 29, 35,

76, 201, 203

correctional services, 51–52

covariates, 175, 177, 179, 187,

189–190, 196

Crime Reduction Programme,

49–51, 56, 58

criminogenic need, 32–33, 41, 147,

166, 225

critical qualitative theory, 129–131,

133, 135, 137, 139

critical realism, 131

data management, 132–133, 138

deductive, 121–122, 130, 132, 136

deliberative democratic evaluation,

10

desistance, 62, 202–204

deteriorated, 148, 151, 156–157,

159

developmental evaluation, 10

diversity, 8, 51, 57, 132, 134–136,

140, 202

Drug Treatment and Testing Orders

study, 133

Drug Treatment Outcomes

Research Study, 134

dynamic risk factors, 146–147

dysfunctional range, 150, 160

effect sizes, 22, 36–37, 40, 159–160,

163

effective methods, 146

empathy, 30, 32, 37, 75–76,

152–154, 158, 162

empowerment evaluation, 8, 10

253