Inclusivity in Online Platforms: Recruitment Strategies for Improving Participation of Diverse Sociodemographic Groups

Published date01 November 2020
AuthorAnnelieke C. Berg,Sarah N. Giest,Sandra M. Groeneveld,Wessel Kraaij
Date01 November 2020
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13215
989
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 80, Iss. 6, pp. 989–1000. © 2020 The
Authors.
Public Administration Review
published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf
of The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13215.
Annelieke C. van den Berg
Sarah N. Giest
Sandra M. Groeneveld
Wessel Kraaij
Leiden University
Inclusivity in Online Platforms: Recruitment Strategies for
Improving Participation of Diverse Sociodemographic
Groups
Abstract: Governments are increasingly implementing smart and digital approaches to promoting citizen
participation. However, whether online participation platforms are tools that improve inclusivity in citizen
participation remains underexplored. To address this gap, this article focuses on the role of recruitment messages
and their effect on participation in an online participation platform by gender and age. A field experiment with a
neighborhood census sample (N = 6,066) shows that online participation dips for younger and older citizens and is
equal among women and men. For the age groups between 60 and 75, differences in the control and intervention
recruitment messages significantly impacted participation. These findings can help public managers tailor recruitment
strategies to facilitate inclusive participation and represent a first step toward learning what types of messages are
effective for whom.
Evidence for Practice
We find no difference in participation between women and men in an online participation platform,
indicating that these platforms can be inclusive with regard to gender.
Age is a predictor of online participation: initially people are more likely to participate as they grow older,
but around age 65, this effect levels out.
Carefully crafted communication messages can influence the inclusivity of participants.
Behavioral experiments can be used to find out which messages are effective for particular subgroups of the
population.
When we consider the transformative
potential of smart technology in
government, one of the areas in which
technologies can have a strong impact is citizen
participation (Boudjelida, Mellouli, and Lee 2016).
Through the use of new technologies, citizen
participation can become adaptable, mobile,
and broadcastable at an unprecedented capacity
(Ansell and Miura 2020). These features of online
participation platforms give citizens the opportunity
to participate at their own convenience and from their
own homes, thereby lowering barriers to participation
and possibly improving the inclusivity of citizen
participation (Robbins, Simonsen, and Feldman
2008). Online participation platforms that embody
these features may be able to overcome acknowledged
challenges for citizen participation, such as low
turnout rates and the lack of representativeness of
participants (Ebdon and Franklin 2006).
While there is no denying that technology is and has
been at the center of many changes in government
(Dunleavy et al. 2015), it is important to take
into account that technological advancements are
influenced by the sociotechnical context in which
they are implemented (Meijer and Bolívar 2015).
Meijer, Bolívar, and Gil-Garcia (2018, 5) warn those
public managers who believe that “each citizen wants
to participate when the costs are low enough” that
the logic that online participation lowers transaction
costs and thus will enhance inclusivity in participation
is too simplistic and deterministic. In this article,
we unpack parts of the sociotechnical context to
scrutinize whether technologies indeed facilitate
a culture of inclusive policy decision-making in
online citizen participation. We do so by considering
which citizens participate in online participation
platforms and how governments can adjust their
recruitment strategies for reaching an inclusive group
of participating citizens.
In citizen participation, it is recognized that
participatory processes are often dominated by the
“‘usual suspects,’ people who are easily recruited,
vocal, and reasonably comfortable in public arenas”
(Bryson et al. 2012, 29). To some extent, online
participation may open up the playing field to
less vocal members of society, since the setting
Wessel Kraaij is professor in data
science in the Leiden Institute of Advanced
Computer Science at Leiden University in
the Netherlands and principal scientist at
TNO. Currently, he is director of the Data
Science Research Programme at Leiden
University. His research interests are rooted
in information retrieval, machine learning,
and human-computer interaction, with a
special focus on responsible data science
applications in domains such as public
health and e-government.
Email: w.kraaij@liacs.leidenuniv.nl
Sandra M. Groeneveld is professor
of public management in the Institute of
Public Administration at Leiden University,
the Netherlands. Her research interests
include the structure and management of
public organizations, focusing particularly
on questions of diversity and inclusion,
leadership, and organizational change.
She also has a special interest in the use
and development of quantitative research
methods in the field of public administration.
Email: s.m.groeneveld@fgga.leidenuniv.nl
Sarah N. Giest is assistant professor in
the Institute of Public Administration at
Leiden University in the Netherlands. Her
research interests include public digitization
processes and data use within government.
Her recent work evolves around local
projects and publications on the urban
dimension of digital governance looking at
sustainability policy
Email: s.n.giest@fgga.leidenuniv.nl
Annelieke C. van den Berg is a doctoral
candidate in the Institute of Public
Administration and affiliated with the Data
Science Research Programme at Leiden
University in the Netherlands. Her research
centers on inclusivity in digital government-
citizen interactions, with a particular
focus on the possibilities of (big) data for
promoting inclusive citizen participation at
municipal level.
Email: a.c.van.den.berg@fgga.leidenuniv.nl
Research
Symposium:
Transformation
of Government in
the Era of Smart
Technology

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT