Improving large‐scale implementations by applying research and data analysis: A case study on First 5 LA's implementation of PCIT in Los Angeles County
Date | 01 November 2018 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1712 |
Published date | 01 November 2018 |
PRACTITIONER PAPER
Improving large‐scale implementations by applying research
and data analysis: A case study on First 5 LA's implementation
of PCIT in Los Angeles County
Grace Bahng
1
|Marcia Taborga
2
|Christine Bae
2
|Armando Jimenez
3
1
Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, California,
USA
2
Seedling Consulting Group, Los Angeles,
California, USA
3
Evaluation Center of Excellence Department,
First 5 Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,
USA
Correspondence
Grace Bahng, Azusa Pacific University, 701 E.
Foothill Boulevard., Azusa, CA 91702‐7000,
USA.
Email: gbahng@apu.edu; grace@seedlingcg.
com
Funding information
First 5 Los Angeles, Grant/Award Number:
Project ID: 4017; Contract No: 08671
This paper presents the case of First 5 LA's 5‐year countywide implementation
of the Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) program. Enthusiasts of PCI T
pointtoitasahigh‐quality parenting program with the potential to positively
influence child behavior, reduce recidivism into the child welfare system, and
increase caregiver's confidence and self‐esteem. In September 2012, First 5 LA,
an independent County agency in Los Angeles that advocates on behalf of par-
ents with young children, began a $20 million countywide implementation of
PCIT. The collaborative effort between First 5 LA, the Los Angeles County
Department of Mental Health, the Los Angeles County Department of Children
and Family Services, and the University of California, Davis demonstrates the
role that research and data analysis can play in improving large‐scale
implementations.
The authors of this paper were contracted to conduct an evaluation of the
implementation of the countywide PCIT program, and preliminary outcomes were
analyzed after the first round of data collection in early 2015. This paper will
discuss this case and provide examples of how research and data analysis were used
effectively to make key improvements to the design and implementation of the
program. The paper will then discuss bureaucratic challenges and constraints with
the collaborative use of research and data. The paper will conclude with some
recommendations on how research and data can effectively be used to influence pol-
icy implementation in large‐scale implementations involving collaboration among mul-
tiple organizations.
1|INTRODUCTION
This paper presents the case of First 5 Los Angeles's (First 5 LA)
implementation of the Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT)
Training Program throughout all of Los Angeles County to
demonstrate how research and data analysis can be used to improve
the implementation of large‐scale programs. First 5 LA is an inde-
pendent County agency in Los Angeles that advocates on behalf of
parents with young children. In October 2012, First 5 LA launched
a5‐year, $20 million initiative to implement the First 5 LA PCIT
Training Program throughout all of Los Angeles County. Supporters
of PCIT highlight it as a high‐quality parenting program and an evi-
dence‐based practice (EBP) for effectively reducing symptoms
among children between the ages of 2 to 7 years with emotional
and behavioral challenges.
First 5 LA began its initiative throughout all of LA County with the
overarching goal of establishing a workforce with the skills to serve
children between the ages of 2 to 5 years old using PCIT
interventions. The $20 million initiative allocated funds for the follow-
ing: (a) PCIT training for up to 400 mental health clinicians at up to
100 agencies, (b) build‐outs for new PCIT therapy rooms in agencies
offering PCIT, (c) PCIT therapy services to children in Los Angeles
Received: 7 March 2018 Accepted: 14 March 2018
DOI: 10.1002/pa.1712
J Public Affairs. 2018;18:e1712.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1712
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of7
To continue reading
Request your trial