Improving Juvenile Dependency Case Timeliness Through Use of the One Family, One Judge Model

Published date01 January 2013
Date01 January 2013
AuthorAlicia Summers,Corey Shdaimah
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12001
Improving Juvenile Dependency Case
Timeliness Through Use of the One Family, One
Judge Model
By Alicia Summers and Corey Shdaimah
ABSTRACT
Motivated by the timelines set forth by the Adoption and Safe Families Act of
1997, courts are working toward moving cases safely and expeditiously through the
juvenile dependency court system. One strategy to improve timeliness is the imple-
mentation of a one family, one judge (OFOJ) model. This study examines the effects
of OFOJ implementation on timeliness of case processing. Implementation of the
OFOJ model showed a trend toward improved timeliness. Post-OFOJ cases were
quicker to reach case closure than pre-OFOJ cases. Every additional judge on the case
increased time to permanency (i.e., case closure) by 31 days, which means children are
spending one additional month in care per judge. Resolving cases quicker could
improve the courts’ ability to meet statutory timelines, and could lead to better
outcomes for children and families.
In 2009, more than 400,000 children were placed in foster care in the United States
(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth
and Families, Children’s Bureau [USDHHS], 2010). Once placed in foster care, children
spent an average of 27 months in care, with 35% in care for more than two years
(USDHHS, 2010). The passage of the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) in 1997
(P.L. 105-89) set timelines for the dependency court system, with the goal of safely
reducing time in care and achieving better outcomes for children and families. The ASFA
requires that a permanency hearing be held within 12 months of the date the child enters
foster care, and that a termination of parental rights petition be filed, with certain
Alicia Summers, Ph.D., is a Research Associate III at the National Council of Juvenile and Family
Court Judges. Correspondence: asummers@ncjfcj.org
Corey Shdaimah, LL.M., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at the University of Maryland School of
Social Work.
Authors’ Note: The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges wishes to acknowledge
that this material is made possible by Cooperative Agreement No. 2009-MU-MU-K001 from the Office of
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
bs_bs_banner
Juvenile and Family Court Journal 64, no. 1 (Winter) 23
© 2013 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT