Imperfect Bundling in Public–Private Partnerships

Published date01 February 2015
AuthorLUCIANO GRECO
Date01 February 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12122
IMPERFECT BUNDLING IN PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
LUCIANO GRECO
Universit`
adegliStudidiPadova
Abstract
We provide a first contribution to analyze how agency
problems within the private consortium (i.e., imperfect
bundling of private tasks) affect the performance of public–
private partnerships (PPPs). When both public–private and
private–private contracts are incomplete, the profit-sharing
rules are key to regulate private partners’ incentives. In fail-
ing to consider the role of imperfect bundling, the scope for
PPPs may be overrated (or underrated) if the social benefits
of infrastructure quality are large (or small) as compared
to the social cost of operation efficiency. Also, it may be op-
timal for the government to restrict the admissible gover-
nance of private consortia.
1. Introduction
The global financial crisis has caused a marked decline in the value of
public–private partnerships (PPPs) during recent years (EPEC 2013). The
mentioned dynamics is conventionally considered a temporary break in the
long-term cross-country trend toward a larger involvement of private firms in
infrastructure financing and operation. From this perspective, a crucial role
is played by complex contractual or institutional forms of PPPs (Wagenvoort,
de Nicola, and Kappeler 2010).
Luciano Greco, Dipartimento di Scienze economiche, Universit`
a degli Studi di Padova,
via del Santo 33 - 35123 Padova, Italy (luciano.greco@unipd.it).
For very helpful reports, I would like to thank the editor, Myrna Wooders,the associate
editor, and the referee of the Journal of Public Economic Theory; for worthy comments and
suggestions, I would also like to thank Eduardo Engel, Elisabetta Iossa, David Martimort,
Flavio Menezes, Giancarlo Spagnolo, and other participants of the 2012 APET Workshop
on PPPs (Queensland University), the 2013 workshop on “The Economics of Public Pro-
curement” (VTI Stockholm), and the 2013 SIE Conference special session on Public Pro-
curement (University of Bologna).
Received April 21, 2014; Accepted May 4, 2014.
C2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17 (1), 2015, pp. 136–146.
136

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT