Identity Fusion in U.S. Military Members

DOI10.1177/0095327X17737021
Published date01 January 2019
AuthorRoland Hart,Steven L. Lancaster
Date01 January 2019
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Identity Fusion in U.S.
Military Members
Roland Hart
1
and Steven L. Lancaster
2
Abstract
Identity fusion, the visceral sense of interconnectedness between oneself and the
members of a group, has been associated with military service anecdotally and
examined among foreign military groups. However, no study to date has explored
fusion and its relationship with functioning among U.S. military members. The aims
of this study were (1) to examine the incremental predictive validity of fusion, (2) to
examine the relationship between fusion and pro- and antisocial in-group behaviors,
and (3) to determine how one’s attitude toward their military service may affect
fusion. Data were collected via self-report using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk soft-
ware. Results indicated that fusion predicted progroup beliefs and in-group helping
behaviors above and beyond other indicators of military identity. Further, satisfac-
tion with the military mediated the relationship between fusion and willingness to
give time to other veterans. Identifying an important mediator of fusion expands
upon earlier work in the field and suggests routes for future inquiry.
Keywords
identity, fusion, veterans, military, progroup
Across a range of military conflicts, the connection between military personnel is
often described as brotherly or like family (Fredman et al., 2015; Swann et al., 2014).
This level of connection is consistent with recent research in the area of identity
fusion or the melding of oneself with members of a group—creating an instinctual
1
New York University, New York, NY, USA
2
Department of Psychology, Bethel University, St. Paul, MN, USA
Corresponding Author:
Steven L. Lancaster, Department of Psychology, Bethel University, 3900 Bethel Drive, St. Paul,
MN 55112, USA.
Email: steven-lanc aster@bethel.edu
Armed Forces & Society
2019, Vol. 45(1) 45-58
ªThe Author(s) 2017
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X17737021
journals.sagepub.com/home/afs

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT