Hybridizing Law: A Policy for Hybridization Under the Endangered Species Act [Abstract]

Date01 August 2018
Author
48 ELR 10740 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER 8-2018
HONORABLE MENTION
Hybridizing Law: A Policy
for Hybridization Under the
Endangered Species Act [Abstract]
by John A. Erwin
John A. Erwin is a Teaching Fellow at the James E. Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona.
For centuries, hybridization was a poorly under-
stood process thought to be a threat to endangered
species. With the advent of genomic technolo-
gies, those views are starting to change; hybridiza-
tion is now recognized as vital for the formation and
continued persistence of many species. However, our
current system of protection under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) fails to take many of the modern
nuances of evolutionary biology into consideration.
Despite calls for an explicit “hybrid policy” since the
early 1990s, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
National Marine Fisheries Service have instead chosen
to apply a case-by-case approach with no guidance or
overarching policy. With the new technologies, many
species we are currently protecting could technically
be unsuitable for protection based on a rigid interpre-
tation of the ESA. A dened hybrid policy must be
adopted, taking into consideration the twin aims of
protecting genetic lineages and protecting ecosystems.
is abstract is adapted from John A. Erwin, Hybridizing Law: A
Policy for Hybridization Under the Endangered Species Act, 47 ELR
10615 (July 2017).
Copyright © 2018 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT