How to “Run” the Many Moving Parts In and Around Democratic Government? Nissim Cohen, Policy Entrepreneurship at the Street Level (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021). 89 pp. (including index), $20 (paperback), ISBN: 9781108818865.
Published date | 01 January 2022 |
Author | Jos C. N. Raadschelders |
Date | 01 January 2022 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13450 |
192 Public Administration Review • January | Fe bruary 20 22
John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University
Reviewed by: Jos C. N. Raadschelders
How to “Run” the Many Moving Parts In and Around
Democratic Government? Nissim Cohen, Policy
Entrepreneurship at the Street Level (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2021). 89 pp. (including index), $20
(paperback), ISBN: 9781108818865.
Democracy is the best possible institutional
arrangement for a government of, by, and
for the people, and the administrative
state makes democracy viable. It is only in the past
100–150 years, that the size of government has grown
significantly as measured in terms of personnel
size, organizational differentiation, revenue and
expenditures, and primary and secondary laws.
The seemingly sudden growth of bureaucracy was
a concern to Max Weber who wondered whether
democracy would be sustainable under the inexorable
growth of bureaucracy (1980, 836). His concern was
shared by, among others, journalist H. L. Mencken,
novelist Franz Kafka, and composer Erik Satie. A
century later, it is clear that democracy has benefited
from bureaucracy, and the book by Nissim Cohen
sheds light on one category of actors responsible.
To fully appreciate the argument he makes, we need
to recognize that the position and role of government
and its bureaucracy has changed significantly in
a—historically speaking—rather short span of time.
Ever since people became sedentary and started to
live in the imagined communities of city-states, they
established formal institutional arrangements for
governing (Raadschelders 2020). For most of history,
government was a top-down affair: It was run by a
leader (however titled) supported by the aristocracy,
and especially by those among the elites who occupied
leadership positions in the military, the priesthood,
and the bureaucracy. Government and its bureaucracy
was the property of those who ruled. The large
majority of people were treated as subjects, and the
people perceived themselves as subjects.
The American and French Revolutions changed that
institutional arrangement fundamentally into one
where the people slowly changed from subjects into
citizens. In their role of citizen, the people became
sovereign. Since the mid-nineteenth century they
Jos C. N. Raadschelders, professor
and associate dean of faculty, John
Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio
State University. His research interests
include: the nature of the study of public
administration, the nature of democratic
government, comparative government, and
ethics. He was the managing editor of
PAR
,
2006–2011.
Email: raadschelders.1@osu.edu
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 82, Iss. 1, pp. 192–195. © 2021 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13450.
To continue reading
Request your trial