How multinational civil society organisations and non‐governmental organisations lobby policy for human rights in Africa

Date01 May 2020
Published date01 May 2020
AuthorIsrael Bionyi Nyoh
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1903
PRACTITIONER PAPER
How multinational civil society organisations and
nongovernmental organisations lobby policy for human
rights in Africa
Israel Bionyi Nyoh
Department of Media and Communication,
University of Leicester College of Arts
Humanities and Law, Leicester, UK
Correspondence
Israel Bionyi Nyoh, Department of Media and
Communication, University of Leicester
College of Arts Humanities and Law, Leicester
LE1 9HN, UK.
Email: bionyi@outlook.com; ibn1@student.le.
ac.uk
In recent years, the number of international nongovernmental organisations (INGOs)
and international civil society organisations (ICSOs) trying to influence policy
processes in Africa has increased considerably. These players increasingly play an
important role in sociopolitical and life of many African countries. To achieve certain
political results, INGOs and ICSOs often lobby governments, using a variety of tech-
niques. Though lobbying as a public relations (PR) technique is widely discussed in
academic spheres, the debate on the relationship between transnational advocacy
and lobbying as a PR practice is still marginal. This paper explores how INGOs
and ICSOs lobby governments in Africa and examines via a case the effectiveness
of activist lobbying in the continent.
1|INTRODUCTION
There is no doubt evidencebased research and informed communica-
tions are important tools for policy influencing. But in the domain of
public affairs and lobbying, policy influencing can be difficult,
especially where political systems are fragile and unstable. With the
spike in policyinfluencing programmes on human rights as non
governmental organisation (NGO) numbers increase in the world
(Davies, 2016), there is a growing debate about evidence of influence
on decisionmaking processes and how to measure it (Schwab, 2013).
When the United Kingdom adopted the United Nations' (UN) tar-
get to spend 0.7% of gross domestic product on foreign aid in 2015,
the outcome was attributed to lobby efforts of a number of U.K.
based transnational charities. Christian Aid, Bond, Oxfam, and a host
of others received praise for their advocacy for the change in policy.
In April, the same year, the Guardian (Clarke and Hanif, 2015) asked
the question how NGOs could lobby governments effectively. Aca-
demic interest on NGOs' lobbying policy increased significantly over
the past few decades. Three reasons can attempt to explain that. First,
NGO actors have become increasingly influential in national and inter-
national decisionmaking processes (Rietig, 2011, pp. 411; IISD,
2013). Second, lobbying became popular, professionalised over the
years, and NGOs sought this public relations (PR) approach to influ-
ence and change policies (De Figueiredo & Richter, 2014; Parvin,
2007). Third, as NGOs increasingly engage in the practice of lobbying,
research suggests policymakers began perceiving them as honest bro-
kers.In his comprehensive survey on lobbying community in the
United Kingdom, Parvin (2007, pp. 2129) finds that Members of par-
liament (MPs) in the United Kingdom were likely to trust arguments
from charities than businesses or interest groups. Further, Parvin's sur-
vey finds the lobbying approach of NGOs relatively effective to per-
suade MPs as compared to other lobby groups.
Though lobbying raised academic interest over the last three
decades, a potent area marginally debated in PR literature is the
relationship between transnational human rights activism and lobbying
as a PR practice. This paper attempts to answer the Guardian UK's
question but focuses on how human rights NGO actions can lead to
change in policy. It examines lobby communications systems as a tech-
nical capacity and analyses discourse to demonstrate how NGO
actions bring about public policy change.
2|IS LOBBYING PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND CSO
NGO?
Regarding human rights, NGOs or/and CSOs do most of the lobbying
or/and public affairs (Mulcahy, 2015; Matthew & Chêne, 2017). But
the terminologies often spark debates and controversies among
scholars. Because their definitions often overlap, vary among
Received: 13 November 2018 Accepted: 16 November 2018
DOI: 10.1002/pa.1903
J Public Affairs. 2019;e1903.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1903
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of6
J Public Affairs.2020;20:e1903. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1of6
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1903

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT