Housing Repair Contractor: Bribe or Gratuity?

AuthorCecil C. Kuhne III
Pages19-23
19
3
Housing Repair
Contractors:
Bribe or Gratuity?
United States v. Jennings
160 F.3d 1006 (4th Cir. 1998)
Larry Jennings, a housing repair contractor, was found guilt y of three
counts of violating a federal statute that prohibits corruption of ocia ls
who administer state and local programs disbursing federal funds.
Jennings argued that the statute outlaws only bribes, not gratuities,
and that the government did not prove that the payments he made to
a city ocial were act ually bribes. Jennings also contended that a new
trial was required because the jury instruct ions misstated the “corrupt
intent” element of bribery by failing to requi re proof of intent to engage
in a quid pro quo.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT