Holden Caulfield Grows Up: Salinger v. Colting, the Promotion-of-Progress Requirement, and Market Failure in a Derivative-Works Regime

AuthorJohn M. Newman
PositionJ.D. Candidate, The University of Iowa College of Law
Pages737-759
737
Holden Caulfield Grows Up: Salinger v.
Colting, the Promotion-of-Progress
Requirement, and Market Failure
in a Derivative-Works Regime
John M. Newman
ABSTRACT: In 2009, the pseudonymous “John David California”
announced plans for U.S. publication of 60 Years Later: Coming
Through the Rye, a “sequel” to J.D. Salinger’s canonical novel The
Catcher in the Rye. Salinger reacted swiftly, bringing a copyright-
infringement suit to enjoin publication of the new work. The district court
granted the injunction, effectively banning U.S. distribution of the sequel
and unintentionally illustrating modern copyright law’s troubling
divergence from the purpose of the constitutional grant of copyright
authority to Congress.
Economic analysis demonstrates the tension caused by the repeated,
incremental expansion of copyright protections—at some point, the
Copyright Act will fail to incentivize the net dissemination of new works. A
check on congressional authority is needed. While a multitude of scholars
have advocated for the First Amendment to serve as such, this Note proposes
that the “promotion-of-progress” requirement of Article I, Section 8 of the
U.S. Constitution provides a superior alternative to direct First Amendment
scrutiny. Thus, where the Copyright Act fails to encourage artistic output—
and, as applied to situations like Salinger v. Colting, it almost certainly
does—the Act is unconstitutional.
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 739
II. UTILITARIANISM AND THE MODERN DERIVATIVE-WORKS RIGHT ........... 742
J.D. Candidate, The University of Iowa College of Law, 2011; B.A., Iowa State
University, 2007. For their excellent suggestions and counterarguments, I would like to thank
Professor Stewart Sterk and Professor Thomas F. Cotter. For sharing her wisdom, guidance, and
considerable expertise, I would like to thank Professor Christina Bohannan, who consistently
manages to make studying law fun. For their diligence in editing this Note, I am grateful to the
editors and student writers of Volumes 95 and 96 of this journal. To my family, fri ends, and
Rachel: thank you.
738 IOWA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 96:737
A. THE UTILITARIAN FOUNDATIONS OF U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW ................ 742
B. THE ECONOMICS OF COPYRIGHTS DERIVATIVE-WORKS PROTECTION .. 743
III. A TEMPEST IN A TEAPOT: THE UNEASY CASE FOR APPLYING FIRST
AMENDMENT SCRUTINY TO COPYRIGHT LAW ......................................... 747
A. PROBLEMS WITH CONSTRUCTING A FRAMEWORK FOR FIRST
AMENDMENT SCRUTINY OF COPYRIGHT ............................................. 748
B. THE COPYRIGHT ACTS INTERNAL FREE-SPEECH SAFEGUARDS ............ 749
IV. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAUSE: INTERNAL LIMITS ON THE
CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE SCOPE OF COPYRIGHT LAW .............. 750
A. PROMOTION OF PROGRESS AND THE “ENGINE OF FREE EXPRESSION ... 751
B. PROMOTION OF PROGRESS AS A LIMITATION ON CONGRESSIONAL
COPYRIGHT AUTHORITY ................................................................... 752
V. PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF THE
INTERNAL LIMITS ON CONGRESSIONAL COPYRIGHT AUTHORITY TO
SALINGER V. COLTING .............................................................................. 753
A. DERIVATIVE-WORKS RIGHTS AND J.D. SALINGERS INCENTIVES TO
AUTHOR THE CATCHER IN THE RYE ................................................ 754
1. Salinger’s Exclusive Right To Prepare Derivative Works .... 755
2. Salinger’s Exclusive Right Not To Prepare Derivative
Works? ..................................................................................... 755
B. THIS APPLICATION OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT WAS LIKELY
UNCONSTITUTIONAL ........................................................................ 757
VI. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 758

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT