Helvering v. Davis 301 U.S. 619 (1937)

AuthorGrace Ganz Blumberg
Pages1283-1284

Page 1283

Plaintiff, a stockholder of an affected CORPORATION, challenged Titles II and VIII of the 1935 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT. Title II creates the old age benefits program, popularly known as "social security," and Title VIII contains the funding mechanism for that program. Under Title VIII, an employer must take a payroll deduction from each employee's wages and pay it, together with an equal amount directly from the employer, to the treasury.

Plaintiff's primary argument was that Congress lacked constitutional power to levy a tax for the purpose of providing old age benefits. Justice BENJAMIN N. CARDOZO, writing an opinion in which six other Justices joined, resoundingly rejected the argument that Congress had transgressed the TENTH AMENDMENT reservation to the

Page 1284

states of powers not delegated to the federal government. Only Justices JAMES C. MCREYNOLDS and PIERCE BUTLER dissented. The majority classified the old age benefits program as a legitimate exercise of Congress's power "to lay and collect taxes ? to ? provide ? for the GENERAL WELFARE of the United States." The Court adopted a fluid definition of the general welfare. "Nor is the concept of the general welfare static. Needs that were narrow or parochial a century ago may be interwoven in our day with the well-being of a nation." The Court then examined the effects on older workers of the "purge of nation-wide calamity that began in 1929" and concluded that the problem was national in scope, acute in severity, and intractable without concerted federal effort. State governments were deficient in economic resources and reluctant to finance social programs that would place them at comparative economic disadvantage with competitor states: industry would flee the new taxes and INDIGENTS would flock to any state that provided the new social benefits. (Justice Cardozo's analysis proved prescient. In the 1960s and 1970s a number of socially progressive northeastern and western states experienced these twin problems when they far exceeded national benefit norms in the federal-state cooperative programs of Aid to Families with Dependent Children and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT