Personal guaranty does not preclude gain recognition on transferred liabilities.

AuthorLerman, Jerry L.

Sec. 357(c) is an exception to the general nonrecognition rules for incorporations under Sec. 35 1(a); it provides that gain is recognized to the extent that liabilities assumed exceed the total adjusted basis of the property transferred.

In Peracchi, 143 F3d 487 (9th Cir. 1998), a somewhat curious pro-taxpayer decision, the court held that a creditworthy shareholder's basis in his own note contributed to his wholly owned corporation equaled its fade amount. The Ninth Circuit concluded that the promissory note represented valid debt; Sec. 357(d) did not apply, because the transferred assets' aggregate basis exceeded transferred liabilities. A like result was reached in Lessinger, 872 F2d 519 (2d Cir. 1989), in which credence had been given to a shareholder-generated loan receivable held equal to the excess of liabilities assumed over assets transferred.

In Seggerman Farms Inc., 308 F3d 803 (7th Cir. 2002), the taxpayers had apparently overlooked the Sec. 357(c) gain recognition rule. As a result of creditor pressure, the Seggermans incorporated their farming business. The liabilities that the new corporation assumed were significantly in excess of the adjusted basis of the assets transferred. Crucial to their defense was the fact that they had remained secondarily liable as guarantors on all the transferred debt.

The Seggermans argued in Tax Court that there was no "enrichment" as part of the transfer; they remained liable on all debts. They maintained that Sec. 357(c) should be disregarded after the Tax Court rejected their other arguments. In essence, their arguments were shrouded under the cover of "equitable relief."

The Seventh Circuit ruled that the Tax Court had not erred in (1) relying on precedents that sanctioned the automatic trigger of Sec. 357(c) and (2) concluding that there is no requirement that the transferor be relieved of liability. The Tax Court had previously held that the fact that application of Sec. 357(c) could result in gain realization...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT