Going My Way? Wending a Way Through the Stumbling Blocks Between Georgism and Catholicism

AuthorMASON GAFFNEY
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00843.x
Date01 October 2012
Published date01 October 2012
RERUM NOVARUM
Going My Way? Wending a Way Through
the Stumbling Blocks Between Georgism
and Catholicism
By MASON GAFFNEY*
ABSTRACT. This essay surveys the issues between Georgists and
Roman Catholics in three classes: issues that are not peculiarly Roman
Catholic (RC) but play out across faiths and denominations, issues that
are peculiarly RC, and points of similarity and agreement. Addressed
in this fashion are the tensions that arise between the social gospel
and individual salvation, between specifics and glittering generalities,
between noblesse oblige and governmental reform, between the doc-
trine of original sin and tabula rasa, between the rich and the poor,
between the dignity of labor and the honor of predation, between
democracy and authority, between the regulatory emphasis rooted in
the philosophy of Aquinas and free markets, and between plain talk
and gobbledegook.
Introduction
There have been and are many Georgist Catholics and Catholic
Georgists. The divisions inside each group are perhaps as deep as the
divisions between them. This bodes well for future cooperation
between at least some Georgists and some Catholics.
Some outstanding Catholic Georgists or fellow-travelers in politics
have been Fr. Edward McGlynn (see Gaffney 2000), Governor Al Smith,
Mayor and Governor Edward Dunne, Mayor Daniel Hoan, union leader
Margaret Haley, presidential advisor Joseph Tumulty, Mrs. Henry
George, Governor John Peter Altgeld, and Mayor Mark Fagan. Some
current Georgist/Catholics are John Kelly of Peoria, Terry Dwyer of
Canberra, Bryan Kavanagh of Melbourne, and David Kromkowski of
*Mason Gaffney is Professor of Economics at University of California, Riverside.
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 71, No. 4 (October, 2012).
© 2012 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.
Maryland. Some of them, like McGlynn and Smith, met stiff resistance
from upper echelons of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) hierarchy,
but that is one of the internal divisions we will explore. Some, like
Patrick Ford and Terence Powderly, succumbed to the pressure.
The hierarchy has also repressed Catholic land reformers of other
stripes: the worker priests of France and the liberation theologists of
Brazil, for example. The knee-jerk reaction has been to cry “Marxism”
and clamp down. In turn, some Catholic land reformers in power have
suppressed the RCC and confiscated its lands, as in Mexico. Catholic
King Louis XV of France expelled the Jesuits, who did not return until
1814, under aegis of the Holy Alliance. Either way there has been
considerable hostility. The hierarchy has generally allied with big
landowners, while many priests, like France’s Abbé Pierre, have
identified with the landless.
This essay surveys the issues between Georgists and Roman Catho-
lics in three classes: issues that are not peculiarly Roman Catholic (RC),
issues that are peculiarly RC, and points of similarity and agreement.
I have not come to reopen the Thirty Years’ War. My hope and intent
is to help the points of agreement override the differences.
Generic Issues Between Georgists and Clerics, and Among
Clerics of All Faiths and Denominations
The Social Gospel vs. Individual Salvation
With the ascendancy of altar-calling evangelist Billy Graham, Protestant
Christianity leaped far away from the social gospel of, say, Walter
Rauschenbusch and WashingtonGladden of the Progressive Era and the
mild liberalism of The Christian Century. The Elmer Gantry phenom-
enon was of course well known before that, as was the “Monkey Trial”
subculture of Dayton, Tennessee, but they were on the downswing. In
the Cold War era, however, Protestant Americans suddenly responded
en masse and without much discretion, flocking to caricatures of
Graham, and televangelists like Bebe Patten, Jim and Tammy Bakker,
Paul Crouch, Jimmy Swaggart, Pat Robertson, Gene Scott, Jerry Falwell,
and many others of like bent. They attacked the social gospel with as
much vigor as they preached individual salvation.
Going My Way? 887

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT