Goal achievement in municipal strategic planning: The role of executives' background and political context
Published date | 01 September 2023 |
Author | Ricardo A. Bello‐Gomez,Claudia N. Avellaneda |
Date | 01 September 2023 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13630 |
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Goal achievement in municipal strategic planning: The role of
executives’background and political context
Ricardo A. Bello-Gomez
1
| Claudia N. Avellaneda
2
1
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
2
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Correspondence
Ricardo A. Bello-Gomez, Texas Tech University,
Holden Hall, 118, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Email: rbellogo@ttu.edu
Abstract
Strategic planning has been increasingly used by local governments worldwide to
boost performance. While this can be seen as a technical and political process, the
relationship between managerial qualifications, political context and achievement
of strategic goals in local governments has been scarcely studied. This study
explores these relationships using data from 137 Colombian municipalities at the
middle and end of the 2016–2019 mayoral term. Findings suggest that midterm
strategic goal achievement is associated with mayoral experience, particularly in
the national government where the tradition of strategic planning is better estab-
lished, and this relationship increases with higher levels of municipal council sup-
port. Certain traits of the chief planning officer, appointed by the mayor, also
correlate positively with midterm goal achievement. End-term goal achievement is
mainly associated with midterm paths. This research contributes to the perfor-
mance management literature by highlighting the political-managerial interplay in
strategic goal achievement.
Evidence for practice
•Even in contexts where strategic planning is mandated from the top-down,
there is a space for managerial action to shape the strategic plan and improve
goal achievement.
•Leaders’experiences at different levels of government allow developing of var-
ied skills or acquiring distinct types of knowledge that can affect successful
implementation of municipal strategic plans.
•Chief planning officers perceived as more academically competent or having
more experience in intergovernmental affairs are associated with higher levels
of strategic goal achievement.
•Mayors enjoying higher levels of political support in the city council can better
leverage their expertise to achieve successful strategic implementation.
INTRODUCTION
Since the 1980s, public organizations have increasingly
incorporated strategic planning and strategic manage-
ment in their governance toolkits (Ferlie & Ongaro, 2015).
Scholars have extensively studied strategic planning as
an organizational outcome, explaining the drivers that
lead to its adoption and implementation by public
organizations (Bryson, 1995;George&Desmidt,2014;
Poister & Streib, 1999). However, strategic planning “is
useful only if it is carefully linked to implementation —
and this is often where the process breaks down”
(Poister & Streib, 2005, p. 46). Moreover, the popularity
of strategic planning, both in the public and private
sectors, relies on its expected contribution to organiza-
tional performance (Andrews, 1980,Dror,1983,Locke
and Latham 2002). Therefore, as strategic planning
became widely adopted, research has shifted toward
understanding the conditions for successful implementa-
tion of strategic plans (George, Walker, & Monster, 2019;
Poister & Streib, 2005). Research has also explored the link-
age between strategic planning and performance manage-
ment (Bianchi & Tomaselli, 2015; Moynihan, 2008;
Poister, 2010), as well as the performance effects of adopt-
ing and implementing strategic planning (see George
et al., 2019 for a review and meta-analysis).
Received: 21 February 2022 Revised: 7 February 2023 Accepted: 1 March 2023
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13630
1088 © 2023 American Society for Public Administration. Public Admin Rev. 2023;83:1088–1107.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/puar
Scholars have identified positive impacts of strategic
planning in public organizations’performance in different
contexts, such as Norwegian municipalities (Johnsen, 2018),
Canadian public organizations (Elbanna, Andrews, &
Pollanen, 2016) and U.S. county governments (Lee,
McGuire, & Kim, 2018), among others. However, these
effects seem to be contingent on the chosen approach
to performance assessment (George et al., 2019;
Jimenez, 2013). Moreover, research also has highlighted
the influence of stakeholders’perception (Elbanna
et al., 2016) and of several managerial practices (Jung &
Lee, 2013;Poister,Pasha,&Edwards,2013)insuccessful
strategic planning implementation. Nevertheless,
scarce attention has been given to the qualifications of
top executives, despite their key role in steering the
overall strategic planning process and in gathering
internal and external stakeholder support. Furthermore,
in the case of elected local governments, understand-
ing the role of both top executives and key stake-
holders requires using managerial and political lenses.
In this sense, strategic planning and management
become technical and political processes.
Colombia presents interesting cases for studying the
interaction between managerial and political factors in
achieving strategic goals. Latin America’s long-standing
tradition of development planning dates back to the late
1950s and originally embraced a top-down approach to
boost economic development (Mejia Guinand, 2016).
Since the 1980s, however, the structures and capacity for
planning have shifted toward a strategic planning
approach, in line with New Public Management (NPM)
reforms across the region (Leiva Lavalle, 2012). As a result
of these combined traditions, Colombian local govern-
ments are mandated to conduct a strategic planning pro-
cess every 4 years. “Holding constant”strategic plan
formulation, this setting allows for studying whether the
qualifications and roles of the key municipal executive
actors, the mayor and the chief planning officer, influence
strategic goal achievement. In addition, because the
implementation of planning strategies and actions
requires municipal council’s support, mayoral ability to
mount a strong support base also should contribute to
achieving strategic goals.
This study explores these relationships using cross-
sectional data from 137 Colombian municipalities. The
analysis combines administrative data for midterm (2017)
and end-term (2019) achievement of strategic goals, and
information derived from a 2019 survey with incumbent
Colombian mayors. Findings suggest that midterm goal
achievement is associated with mayoral experience in the
national and local public sectors. Results also suggest the
relationship with national public experience, where
the tradition of strategic planning is better established,
increases as city council’s support for the mayor grows.
Moreover, some characteristics of the chief planning offi-
cers, such as their academic background and intergovern-
mental experience, also seem to boost midterm goal
achievement. While these factors are well rooted in public
administration literature, they remain scarcely explored in
the process of strategic planning and management. This
research contributes to the field of public administration
by assessing the role of executives’qualifications and
political support in achieving strategic goals, thus
expanding the set of managerial and environmental
explanations of the link between strategic planning and
performance. In addition, this article also highlights the
need to expand and test public administration theories in
the context of emerging and developing countries with
diverse institutional trajectories.
MANAGEMENT AND POLITICS IN MUNICIPAL
ACHIEVEMENT OF STRATEGIC GOALS
Bryson (2011, 7) defines strategic planning as a “delibera-
tive, disciplined effort to produce fundamental decisions
and actions that shape and guide what an organization
(or other entity) is, what it does, and why.”By providing a
thorough analytical framework for strategy development
(Dior 1983, George et al., 2019), strategic planning may
contribute to organizational performance. Yet, strategic
planning requires concrete strategies (Locke and Latham
2002) and their translation into specific and even individ-
ual goals (Jung & Lee, 2013) to make that contribution.
Moreover, strategic planning boosting performance
implies a successful strategy implementation, that is, the
actual achievement of strategic goals.
The transition from adoption to implementation of
strategic planning requires a proper performance mea-
surement system to keep track of goal achievement, as
well as effective managerial efforts to realize it. As pro-
posed by Poister (2010, p. S251), “strategic management
can be viewed as performance management at a strategic
level”. Indeed, public managers may treat strategic plan-
ning and performance management as integrated sys-
tems (Moynihan, 2008), which are part of an overarching
rational approach to public management (Jimenez, 2013).
Furthermore, some scholars consider performance and
strategic management as dynamic intertwined processes
where the identification of key stakeholders becomes
vital for success (Bianchi & Tomaselli, 2015; Noto &
Noto, 2019). Therefore, to fully understand the setting,
tracking, and achievement of strategic goals, it is neces-
sary to focus on key actors who oversee the implementa-
tion of strategic planning, given the key role of
management during the strategic performance process.
Scholars have identified several characteristics among
the people driving the strategic effort that are conse-
quential to its implementation. For instance, managerial
involvement (Elbanna et al., 2016) becomes a key factor
for a strategic plan’s implementation. Other research has
shown combining strategic planning with performance
management practices also yields positive results in terms
of implementation and performance (Poister et al., 2013).
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW 1089
To continue reading
Request your trial