Global Litigator. How U.K. Employment Protection Law Affects U.S. Companies

AuthorFahim rahman
Pages11-12
Published in Litigation, Volume 48, Number 2, Winter 2022. © 2022 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not
be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. 11
Global Litigator
FAHIM RAHMAN
The author is lead labor and employment counsel, Europe, Middle East, and Africa, for 3M Company and
is based in London.
HOW U.K. EMPLOYMENT
PROTECTION LAW
AFFECTS U.S.
COMPANIES
TUPE, an acronym for Transfer of
Undertakings (Protection of Employment),
is United Kingdom–derived legislation
that has a fascinating effect on U.S.-
headquartered, global companies’ legal,
human resources, and business functions.
In particular, TUPE laws are designed to
protect the rights of employees of com-
panies that are being sold as asset sales.
Many other countries have enacted their
own equivalent of TUPE.
TUPE laws are triggered when there
is a sale of a business whose employees
are based in a country with TUPE protec
-
tions. An underappreciated feature, how-
ever, is that TUPE also may come into play
in transactions that involve the outsourc-
ing of functions, bringing functions back
in house, or re-tenderings (i.e., moving a
function from one external provider to
another). The impact of noncompliance
with any applicable TUPE legislation can
be significant and, in some cases, can ne-
gate the commercially driven benefits of a
transaction. As a result, in a world where
global organizations are increasingly
contemplating outsourcing and similar
transactions, it is important to assess any
employee-related impact before a defini-
tive decision is made. Failing to do so may
result in either party to the transaction
facing the prospect of defending employee
claims in foreign tribunals.
TUPE legislation was born out of
the European Union’s Acquired Rights
Directive, which was passed in 1977 to
protect ongoing employment rights within
a business unit that was being sold. The
workers were entitled to maintain their
jobs in the sale of a business under the
same terms and conditions as those agreed
upon with their original employer. Per the
Union countries were required to adopt
their own equivalent of TUPE. The United
Kingdom did so by enacting the TUPE leg-
islation initially back in 1981 and renewed
it in 2006. The United Kingdom’s TUPE
legislation is widely regarded as the
benchmark not only for the European
Union countries but also for other coun-
tries that have decided to implement simi-
lar protective legislation.
very prescriptive or detailed in terms of
what constituted a relevant transfer of
business assets for these purposes or how
to determine which employees will be im-
pacted or covered. Because the Acquired
Rights Directive provided only minimum
protective standards, these questions were,
by and large, left to each European Union
country to decide. Despite these country-
by-country differences, there are five fun-
damental elements that apply consistently.
Having a basic understanding of these five
elements, together with a grasp of the pur-
poses underlying them, will help lawyers
avoid protracted and costly litigation for
their clients in foreign labor courts.
The Five Fundamental Elements
First, when the transaction in question
is complete, the relationship (including
all terms and conditions) of all employ-
ees who are assigned to the business be-
ing sold will be transferred automatically
from the seller to the buyer. Typical TUPE
provisions assign an employee to the busi-
ness unit if the employee spends 50 per-
cent or more working hours within such
business unit. Employees who meet or
exceed the 50 percent threshold are re-
garded as in-scope for a TUPE transfer.
Employees who don’t meet the 50 percent
threshold are considered out-of-scope
and would remain in employment with
the seller.
Second, the seller must provide certain
information about the impacted employ-
ees to the buyer ahead of the closing of
the contemplated transaction so that the
buyer has an adequate opportunity to as-
sess what it needs to put in place to be
able to continue with the employment of
those it is about to inherit.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT