Generational Status and Mexican American Political Participation: The Benefits and Limitations of Assimilation

Published date01 March 2011
AuthorGary M. Segura,Wayne A. Santoro
Date01 March 2011
DOI10.1177/1065912909346738
Subject MatterArticles
Political Research Quarterly
64(1) 172 –184
© 2011 University of Utah
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1065912909346738
http://prq.sagepub.com
Generational Status and Mexican
American Political Participation: The
Benefits and Limitations of Assimilation
Wayne A. Santoro1 and Gary M. Segura2
Abstract
The authors investigate self-reported voter turnout and ethnic political activity across four-plus generations of Mexican
Americans. Using a 1999 national survey, multivariate results indicate that the likelihood of Mexican American voting
increases largely in a monotonic manner across generations while participation in ethnic political activity begins to
decline after having one parent born in the United States. These results raise the question of whether disadvantaged
ethnic populations necessarily benefit politically from assimilating given that gains in voting that accrue across
generations are accompanied by declines in ethnic political activity among later generations.
Keywords
Mexican American, political participation, generation, assimilation
Immigrants and their descendents have an interest in par-
ticipating politically in the United States because such
activity helps them influence governments to address
their needs (Dahl 1961; Lieberson 1980; Portes and
Rumbaut 1996). Yet, few studies have examined how par-
ticipation varies across generations beyond the second.
Early work on mainly white ethnic voting was focused
on party and policy preferences rather than turnout and
joining political causes (Dahl 1961; Wilson and Banfield
1964; Wolfinger 1965). Likewise, political participation
theories are not designed to explain changes across gen-
eration, and assimilation theories are seldom applied to
political incorporation. In light of this lacuna, we put
forth an approach to explain political participation by
Mexican Americans across four-plus generations. We
focus on Mexican Americans because they are the largest
immigrant population in the United States, making up
30 percent of the foreign-born population in 2005, and
because they have greater generational depth than any
other Latino or Asian American population. Another
advantage of studying Mexican Americans is that their
political incorporation experiences may closely mirror
those of turn-of-the-century immigrants (Portes and
Rumbaut 1996), in part because Mexicans have been
present in both immigration waves.
Understanding the link between generation and political
participation among Mexican Americans necessitates
distinguishing between two types of political acts. The first
is voting. Voting is the most frequent form of political
activity for all Americans regardless of race or ethnicity.
We believe voting will increase generally in a linear
manner across generation, flattening as it reaches its ceil-
ing. This expectation is grounded in the resource model
and classic assimilation theory. The second type of politi-
cal participation is involvement in ethnic political acts.
Ethnic political acts are inspired specifically by concerns
with advancing ethnic political causes, such as boycot-
ting produce to support farm workers or campaigning for
a political candidate because the candidate is of Mexican
origin. Drawing upon diverse theoretical traditions, we
think that generational status will be linked to ethnic
political acts in a curvilinear manner: greater among the
second or third generation than the first but declining
among distant generations. Together, these predications
view assimilation processes as both strengthening and
weakening the political position of Mexican Americans
in that gains in voting that accrue across generations
should be accompanied by declines in ethnic political
activity among later generations.
We seek to make both theoretical and empirical contri-
butions to the study of racial and ethnic politics. In light
1University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
2Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Corresponding Author:
Gary M. Segura, Stanford University, Department of Political Science,
616 Serra St., Encina Hall 100 West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
E-mail: segura@stanford.edu

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT