Gender and Editorial Outcomes at Legislative Studies Quarterly

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12255
Published date01 August 2019
Date01 August 2019
Gender and Editorial Outcome s at Legislative Studies Quarterly
A recent issue of the L egislative Studies Se ction’s newsletter, The
Legislative Sc holar, had a very informative dis cussion of gender
issues related to t he section. Some of the contributions m ade ref-
erence to Legi slative Studies Quarterly. Not having data on sub-
missions to the jour nal, conclusions regard ing publication rates
were without a denominator, and I would like to provide some
further in formation in that regard.
We have submission data dating back to 2016 when the journal
first star ted using Scholar One (and the point at which it moved
to WashU). Our managing editor at Wiley, Michelle Mart ire, sent
the names and countr ies of residence of every author who submit-
ted to the journa l since the beg inning of 2016 to https://gender-
api.com/, and it assigned gender, male or female appare ntly being
the only options, to each na me. I then hand coded the gender
of any scholar about whom the API was less than 75% certai n.
Michelle then integrated that gender data back into a dataset
about submissions and manuscript status. Th is dataset included
453 manuscripts.
As a frame of reference, the newsletter reporte d that 22% of
Legislative Studies section’s members are women. Clearly, the
journal is not lim ited to section me mbers for submissions, but
the section does provide some point of reference. In the last t hree
years (plus a few weeks into 2019), 26% of all authors who sub-
mitted to the jour nal were women (I counted an author once p er
submission). Female authors were 26% of all authors whose man-
uscripts did not get published (this includes a few works about
which a decision ha s not yet been reached), and they were 27% of
all the authors whose work was acce pted for publication.
Female authors submitted 28% of the manus cripts that were solo-
authored. Solo-authored work by female authors was accept ed
10% of the time. Solo-authored work by male authors was ac-
cepted 11% of the time. Women were 26% of the authors on co-
authored papers.
© 2019 Washington University in St. L ouis
387
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 44, 3, August 2019
DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12255

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT