GAS AND POWER: Russia's latest energy clash with West is in Balkans

Date01 June 2015
Published date01 June 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/oet.12256
GAS AND POWER
Russia’s latest energy clash with West is in Balkans
A new front in the energy battle between Russia and
the West has opened up in the small Balkan state of
Macedonia. What began as an apparently internal dis-
pute over the result of this year’s general election has
become part of a wider argument between Moscow and
the West. Opposition groups have taken to the streets
demanding the resignation of the Prime Minister,Nikola
Gruevskiandhisgovernment,allegingarangeofmal-
practices during and since the election. Some ocials
in Moscow, however, see these protests as desig ned to
undermine a government that they regard as broadly
sympathetictoRussia,andtoreplaceitwithamorehard
line pro-western administration.
Russian concern
e immedi ate cause of Russian conc ern is what is seen
as a Western-led move to block the building of a major
gas export pipeline from Russia to Central and Western
Europe through the Balkans. Russia’s Gazprom wants
to end the practice of exporting gas to Europe using
pipelines that cro ss Ukraine to counter what it sees as
thethreatofafuturegovernmentinKievshutting-o
supplies of Russian gas to countries in Europe.
To this end, Gazprom has begun the construction of
anewgaspipelineacrosstheBlackSeatoTurkey.e
newline,knownasTurkishStream,ismeanttoformthe
rst stage of a new export route into Central and Western
Europe via the Balkans. From Turkey it is planned to
cross into Greece and from there through Macedonia
andSerbiatoCentralEurope,whereitwillconnectto
the main gas transmis sion networks of Central, Western,
and Southern Europe.
Following talks in Moscow in April,Greece appears to
have agreed in principle to a connection to the pipeline
at the Turkish border, while Serbia and Hungary have
also indicated their willingness to take Russian gas by
this route. is will requirethe building of a pipeline link
through Macedoniato these countries. Moscow believes
it has the support of the Macedonian government for
such a link, but fears that the current unrest there could
bring about a change of government, which could delay
or even prevent the const ruction of the pipeline and it
is being suggested in some parts of the Russian govern-
mentthattheprotestsinMacedoniaarepartofaUS-and
European Union-inspired plan designed to bring about
the eventual blocking of the northern extension of the
pipeline.
Uneconomic pipeline?
While Turkish Stream is design ed initially to supply sub-
stantial volumes of gas to the rapidly growing Turkish
market, it would be uneconomic without further sal es
into Europe. Even if Greece were to agree to a link
to the scheme, Turkish Stream would remain uneco-
nomic without further sales elsewhere in Europe, hence
Moscow’s anxiety about the situation in Macedonia.
eTurkishStreamprojectbeganlifeasaneast–west
transcontinental pipeline under the name of South
Stream,whichwasdesignedtopassthroughBulgaria
en route to Serbia, Hungary, and Austria, where it
would connect to the main Europe an gas transmis-
sion network. A further link was planned to Italy vi a
Greece. South Stream was designed to carry 6.1 bn cfd
of gas to supplement a 5.3bn cfd pipeline known as
Nord Stream from Russia to Germany, which began
operation in 2010 and runs under the Baltic Sea. e
addition of South Stream to the Balti c route was meant
to eliminate entirely the 9.7 bn cfd exported to Europe
via Ukraine.
e ultimate aim of Turkish Stream is to carry the
same volumes as the original South Stream pipeline.
eonlyrmcustomersofar,however,isTurkeyand
Turkeyh as other options in future to supply its gas needs .
At present, Turkey imports about 98% of its natural
gas, of which just over 60% comes from Russia. e
remainder comes either by pipelinefrom Azerbaijan and
Iran or as liqueed natural gas (LNG). Ankara is actively
exploring the idea of importing from Kurdistan and
Iraq in future and has also announced plans to exploit
what are believed to be extensive shale gas deposits in
the Diyarbakir region of south-eastern Turkey, all of
whichislikelytomeanthatGazpromwillhavetosell
anyadditionalgastoTurkeyviaTurkishStreamata
discount.
© 2015 John Wiley& Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT