From Commemoration to Conviction

AuthorClaire Whitlinger
DOI10.1177/2153368715573366
Published date01 April 2015
Date01 April 2015
Subject MatterArticles
Article
From Commemoration to
Conviction: Prosecuting
Edgar Ray Killen for the
‘‘Mississippi Burning’’ Murders
Claire Whitlinger
1
Abstract
Despite the growing number of civil rights era cold cases brought to trial over the past 20
years, surprisingly little social scientific research has examined how these cases emerged.
This article examines one such case—the 2005 prosecution of Edgar Ray Killen for the
1964 murder of civil rights workers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael
Schwerner. Using event structure analysis and drawing on archival sources, media
accounts, and interview data, this study finds thatthe trial would not have occurred without
the 40th anniversary commemoration in Philadelphia, Mississippi. Furthermore, this study
suggests that commemorations can serve as mechanisms connecting collective memory
with broader social change by catalyzing mnemonic entrepreneurship and cultivating
organizational structures and resources necessary to achieve positive legal outcomes. Such
outcomes, however, can only occur when political opportunities are favorable and
potential jurors have been primed through the ‘‘memory of commemoration.’’
Keywords
criminal trials, collective memory, race/ethnicity, lynching, civil rights movement
Introduction
On June 21, 2005, Edgar Ray Killen was convicted on three counts of manslaughter in
the 1964 murders of civil rights workers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and
Michael Schwerner. Although those responsible for perpetrating the crime had long
1
Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Corresponding Author:
Claire Whitlinger, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, LSA Building, Room 3001, 500 S. State
Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Email: cwhitlin@umich.edu
Race and Justice
2015, Vol. 5(2) 144-167
ªThe Author(s) 2015
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/2153368715573366
raj.sagepub.com
escaped punishment, the citizens of Philadelphia, Mississippi, where the crimes had
been committed, remained ‘‘in the prison of public opinion’’ for 41 years
(Salter, 2003). As a result of the silence, denial, and collective obstruction of justice
surrounding the murders, Philadelphia had come to represent intractable Southern
racism and the failures of American democracy.
The murders occurred on June 21, 1964, during the 1st week of what would be
called ‘‘Freedom Summer,’’ a massive voter registration campaign in Mississippi
involving hundreds of White students from Northern Universities who had volun-
teered for the summer project. After 6 weeks of investigation, the search effort came to
a close when a local informant provided the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
with the location of the bodies. By the end of the formal investigation, three Klan
members had confessed to the FBI and recounted in detail how local Klansmen—
including business leaders and law enforcement officials—had kidnapped, murdered,
and buried Chaney, Schwerner, and Goodman 30 feet beneath an earthen dam.
Three years after the murders, seven men from Neshoba County and nearby
Lauderdale County were convicted on federal charges that they denied Chaney,
Schwerner, and Goodman their civil rights, but despite over 44 000 pages of FBI
documentation on the case, no one stood trial for murder—a state charge that no
Mississippi District Attorney saw fit to prosecute. That is, until 2005, when a con-
fluence of factors culminated in the indictment and, ultimately, conviction of Edgar
Ray Killen.
The Killen trial is one of nearly a dozen civil rights era cold cases that have been
reopened and prosecuted since 1989. And since 1989, family members of Chaney,
Schwerner, and Goodman have actively called on Mississippi state legal authorities to
prosecute the case (Chaney, 2000). By 2000, it appeared the case would finally move
forward. An interview with Sam Bowers, the former Imperial Wizard of the White
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan who was serving time for his role in another civil rights
era murder, had been leaked and implicated Edgar Ray Killen as the mastermind
behind the 1964 murders. Shortly, after this information became public, then-
Mississippi Attorney General, Mike Moore, reopened the case. The following year
it appeared the case was gaining traction after the Attorney General’s office collected
testimony from two new witnesses, including the Deputy Sheriff of Philadelphia in
1964—a known accomplice in the killings.
But by the spring of 2001, unforeseeable developments threatened the case’s
viability. Both witnesses died suddenly and their testimony, which had not been
delivered before a jury, was inadmissible in court. The loss of these witnesses seemed
to be the final blow to an already fragile case. By 2002, the Attorney General of
Mississippi reported that there was only a ‘‘slim chance’’ of murder charges being
brought by the state. Effectively, the case was closed.
Then, after a nearly 3-year hiatus—and without having uncovered any additional
evidence—the newly elected Mississippi Attorney General and Neshoba County
District Attorney presented the case before a Neshoba County Grand Jury. That this
seemingly intractable case moved forward without any new evidence is puzzling.
What could have occurred between 2002 and 2005 to propel this case forward?
Whitlinger 145

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT