Tax-free reorganization for great-grandparent stock.

AuthorBloom, Gilbert D.

It seems axiomatic that the acquiring corporation in a reorganization cannot use its grandparent's stock. Of course this same rule applies to its great-grandparent's stock. Yet the IRS over the past few years has punctured so many holes in this precept that taxpayers now do not hesitate to use the stock of a remote upper tier corporation as the consideration in a tax-free reorganization.

Background

For the following discussion assume that corporation A owns all of the stock of corporation B, B owns all of the stock of corporation C and C owns of the stock of corporation D. Target is an unrelated corporation whose assets will be acquired by the ABCD group. Rev. Rul. 64-73 is the starting point in this analysis. However, that ruling only stands for the proposition that when some of Target's assets are acquired by A and some by C, in exchange for A's stock, the transaction might legitimately be viewed as if A acquired all of Target's assets in a "C" reorganization and then A transferred some of those assets to B, which in turn transferred them to C in a "double drop-down" under Sec. 368(a)(2)(C). Since A stock was used and A actually acquired some of Target's assets, it is hard to conclude that Rev. Rul. 64-73 was a grandparent stock ruling.

Also to be considered is Rev. Rul. 70-224, in which B acquired all the assets of Target for A's stock. Since A intended to acquire the Target assets, and had "dominion and control" over them, A was deemed to be the acquiring corporation that "dropped" the assets so acquired to B. The transaction was viewed as a reorganization under Sec. 368(a)(1)(C) and (a)(2)(C), rather than a "C" reorganization for parent's stock. Combining the principle of Rev. Rul. 70-224 with the statutory permissibility of using parent stock allowed B to be the deemed acquiring corporation for A's stock, yet B would cause the Target assets to be directly transferred to C. Thus, grandparent stock was effectively used.

In IRS Letter Rulings 8702056 and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT