FORTY- EIGHTH SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LAW.

• Position: January 2016 through December 2016, p. 382-483 - Bibliography

Part 2 of 2

Kevin Emerson Collins, The Structural Implications of Inventors' Disclosure Obligations Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1785 (2016).

Jorge L. Contreras, A Tale of Two Layers: Patents, Standardization, and the Internet, 93 DENV. U.L. REV. 855 (2016).

Christopher A. Cotropia, Physicalism and Patent Theory Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1543 (2016).

Gregory Dolin & Irina D. Manta, Taking Patents, 73 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 719(2016).

John F. Duffy, Counterproductive Notice in Literalistic versus Peripheral Claiming, 96 B.U. L. REV. 1197 (2016).

Jason Du Mont & Mark D. Janis, Disclosing Designs Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1631 (2016).

Samuel F. Ernst, The Lost Precedent of the Reverse Doctrine of Equivilents, 18 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 467 (2016).

Scott M. Flanz, Octane Fitness: The Shifting of Patent Attorney's Fees Moves Into High Gear, 19 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 329 (2016).

Michael D. Frakes & Melissa F. Wasserman, Patent Office Cohorts, 65 DUKE L.J. 1601 (2016).

Jeanne C. Fromer, Dynamic Patent Disclosure Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1715 (2016).

Christopher C. Funk, The Bar Against Patenting Others' Secrets, 19 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 239 (2016).

Sue Ann Ganske, Marvel, Cisco, and Teva: The U.S. Supreme Court Decides Three Patent Cases in 2015, Respecting Stare Decisis, 24 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 1 (2016).

John M. Golden, Working Without Chevron: The PTO as Prime Mover, 65 DUKE L.J. 1657 (2016).

Mary Grace Griffin, Caught Between a Mark and a Hard Place: Resolving U.S.-Cuban Trademark Disputes in a Post-Embargo World, 23 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 293 (Spring 2016).

Paul R. Gugliuzza, Early Filing and Functional Claiming, 96 B.U. L. REV. 1223 (2016).

Paul R. Gugliuzza, (In)valid Patents, 92 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 271 (2016).

Sahar Hafeez, Case Note of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ' Analysis Regarding the Scope of Review of the Post-Grant By The Patent Trial and Appeal Board in the Case of Versata Development Group, Inc. and Sap AG, 25 FED. CIR. B.J. 217(2016).

Cassandra E. Havens, Saving Patent Law from Competition Policy and Economic Theories: Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L. J. 371 (2016).

Christopher S. Hayter, A Social Responsibility View of the "Patent-Centric Linear Model" of University Technology Transfer, 54 DUQ. L. REV. 7 (2016).

Timothy R. Holbrook, Patent Anticipation and Obviousness as Possession, 65 EMORY L.J. 987 (2016).

Timothy R. Holbrook, The Supreme Court's Quiet Revolution In Induced Patent Infringement, 91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1007 (2016).

Timothy R. Holbrook, The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Evolving Impact on Claim Construction, 24 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 301 (2016).

Timothy R. Holbrook, Patent Disclosure and Time Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1459(2016).

Herbert Hovenkamp, The Emergence of Classical American Patent Law, 58 ARIZ. L. REV. 263 (2016).

Tsu-Sung Hsieh, Preclusion Based on Foreign Patent Judgment and Prosecution History: A Comparative Study to U.S. Patent System, 11 NTU L. Rev. 81 (2016).

Keith N. Hylton, Patent Uncertainty: Toward a Framework with Applications. 96 B.U. L. REV. 1117 (2016).

Trace H. Jackson, Note, Can Jailbreaking Put You In Jail?, 68 FLA. L. REV. 631 (2016).

Aashish R. Karkhanis & Jenna L. Parenti, Toward an Automated First Impression On Patent Claim Validity: Algorithmically Associating Claim Language With Specific Rules Of Law, 19 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 364 (2016).

Steven Katz, Negotiating Arbitration Clauses for Patent Disputes, 63 FED. LAW. 34 (2016).

Amir H. Khoury, The "Unlimitless ": On How to Remedy the Inadequacies of A Language-Based System for Patent Claims, 24 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 103 (2016).

Dustin M. Knight, Lost in Translation: How Practical Considerations in Kirtsaeng Demand International Exhaustion in Patent Law, 50 U. RICH. L. REV. 1333 (2016).

Ronald Knight, Note, Additive Manufacturing of Medical Devices: Maintaining Innovation, Protecting Patients and Avoiding Regulatory Duplication, 9 FED. CTS. L. REV. 125 (2016).

Olga Kokoulina, How Much Is Enough? Standard-Essential Patents and Abuse, 19 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. (2016).

Vivek Krishnan, An Analysis of Post-Grant Review and Inter Partes Review: Who Is Privy Or a Real Party in Interest and What Constitutes Reasonably Could Have Raised Estoppel, 20 VA.J. L.& TECH. 201 (2016).

Megan M. La Belle, Public Enforcement of Patent Law, 96 B.U. L. REV. 1865 (2016).

Amy Landers, The Interconnections between Entrepreneurship, Science, and the Patent System, 2016 UTAH L. REV. 631 (2016).

Jyh-An Lee, Implementing the FRAND Standard in China, 19 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 37 (Fall 2016).

Ilhyung Lee, The Korea Database: WIPO-Administered UDRP Decisions, The First Fifteen Years (2000-2014), 15 CHI.-KENTJ. INTELL. PROP. 261 (2016).

William F. Lee; A. Douglas Melamed, Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Patent Damages, 101 CORNELL L. REV. 385 (2016).

Mark A. Lemley, Ready for Patenting, 96 B.U. L. REV. 1171 (2016).

Mark A. Lemley, The Surprising Resilience of the Patent System, 95 TEX. L. REV. 1 (November 2016).

Susanna H. S. Leong, Diversity in Intellectual Property: Identities, Interests and Intersections, 2016 SlNG. J. LEGAL STUD. 385 (2016).

W. Lesser, Applying Doctrine of Equivalents Tests to Products of Nature Decisions, 24 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 245 (2016).

W. Lesser, Multiple Intellectual Property Damages Complications as in Apple v. Samsung - Try Using Excel, 15 Cm.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 201 (2016).

Benjamin C. Li, Note, The Global Convergence of FRAND Licensing Practices: Towards Interoperable Legal Standards, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 429 (2016).

Gerard Llobet & Jorge Padilla, The Optimal Scope of the Royalty Base in Patent Licensing, 59 J.LL. & Econ. 45 (Feb 2016).

Brian J. Love, Christian Helmers & Markus Eberhardt, Patent Litigation in China: Protecting Rights or the Local Economy, 18 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 713 (Summer 2016).

Jingyuan Luo, Concluding The Akamai Chapter of Divided Infringement: Is the Liability Loophole Closed, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 467 (2016).

Ben McEniery, Patent Eligibility and Physicality in the Early History of Patent Law and Practice, 38 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 175 (Winter 2016).

Douglas Melamed, Over-rewarding Patenting: You Get What You Pay For, 39 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 59 (2016).

Robert P. Merges, A Few Kind Words for Absolute Infringement in Patent Law, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1 (2016).

Lois D. Mermelstein, Cyberspace-Related Patents Since Alice, 71 BUS.LAW.343 (2016).

Michael J. Meurer, Current Issues in Patent Law and Policy, 39 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 71 (2016).

H. Rachael Million-Perez, Post-Lexmark: Status of Prudential Standing in Patent Law, 49 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 227 (2016).

Emily Michiko Morris, The Many Faces of Bayh-Dole, 54 DUQ. L. REV. 81 (2016).

Adine Mitrani, How Rings Fit into the Copyright Scheme: Assessing Their Intrinsic Utilitarian Function, 5 N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. 350 (2016).

Adam Mossoff, Intellectual Property and Innovation: Patents as Commercial Assets in Political, Legal, and Social Contexts, 51 TULSA L. REV. 455(2016).

Craig Allen Nard, Legal Fictions and the Role of Information in Patent Law Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1517 (November 2016).

Nate Ngerebara, Note, Commil v. Cisco: Implications of the Intent Standards for Inducement Liability on Willfulness, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 535 (2016).

Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Judicial Wisdom or Patent Ency? The Eleventh, Seventh and Federal Circuits' Patent Jurisdictional Battle, 32 GA. ST. U.L.REV. 303(2016).

Peggy P. Ni, Note, Rethinking Finality in the PTAB Age, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 557 (2016).

Michael O'Brien et al., Using Signal Theory to Determine Non-Obviousness of Inventions, 23 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 241 (Spring 2016).

Sean M. O'Connor, Essay, Patented Electric Guitar Pickups and the Creation of Modern Music Genres, 23 GEO. MASON L. REV. 1007 (Summer 2016).

Anna A. Onley, Limiting Downstream Effects of Patent Licensing Activity in Software and Electronics: An Argument for Alienability of Patent Licenses to Licensees' Business Successors, 91 CHI.-KENTL. REV. 361 (2016).

Max Stul Oppenheimer, Defending Breakthrough Innovation: the History and Future of State Patent Law, 2016 U.C.L.A J.L. & TECH. 1 (Fall 2016).

Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Pierson, Peer Review, and Patent Law Symposium: The Disclosure Function of the Patent System, 69 VAND. L. REV. 1825 (November 2016).

Christopher Edward Neill, The Drug Short: A New Mechanism for Creating Financial Incentives for the Discovery of Invalid

Pharmaceutical Patents, 23 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 329 (Spring 2016).

David S. Olson, Removing the Troll From the Thicket: The Case for Enhancing Patent Maintenance Fees in Relation to the Size of a Patent Owner's Patent Portfolio, 68 FLA. L. REV. 519 (2016).

Heather Roark Parker, Note, Trade Secrets and Patent Protection: The Unlikely Power Couple Under the AIA, 32 SYRACUSE J. Sci. & TECH. L. REP. 1 (2016).

Ben Picozzi, Comment, Reimaging Finality in Parallel Patent Proceedings, 125 YALE L.J. 2519 (June 2016).

Christelle K. Pride, Note, Misguided Panic and Missed Opportunity for Pharmaceutical Inventions: How Unexpected Results Eclipsed Reasonable Expectation of Success in BMS v. Teva, 31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 587 (2016).

Jason B. Portis, Through the Alice Corp. Looking Glass: Using Pragmatic Arguments to Bring Predictability to Patent Law, 14 Nw. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 237, 254 (2016).

Julian Pymento, Let's Be Reasonable: The Broadest Reasonable Interpretation in the PTAB, 5 N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. 406 (2016).

Margaret Jane Radin, Patent Notice and the Trouble with Plain Meaning, 96 B.U. L. REV. 1093 (2016).

Jason Rantanen, The Doctrinal Structure of Patent Law's Enablement Requirement Symposium...