Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

JurisdictionUnited States
AuthorShaffer, Mark
Date01 January 1997
  1. INTRODUCTION II. ACCOUNTING PROVISIONS

    1. Affected Parties

    2. Elements of the Offense

      1. Record-keeping

      2. Internal Controls

    3. Intent

    4. Affirmative Defenses

    5. Enforcement III. ANTI-BRIBERY PROVISIONS

    6. Affected Parties

    7. Elements of the Offense

    8. Intent

    9. Permissible Payments and Defenses

      1. Routine Government Action

      2. Affirmative Defenses

    10. Enforcement

      1. Prosecution

      2. Attorney General s Guidelines and Opinions

      3. Additional Guidance from the Government IV. PENALTIES

    11. Federal Sentencing Guidelines

    12. Additional Penalties V. CREATING A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FOR THE FPCA VI. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

  2. INTRODUCTION

    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Acts ("FCPA")(1) was enacted in 1977 as a response to a series of corporate bribery scandals involving foreign government officials during the 1970's.(2) Following inquiries by the United States Senate(3) and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"),(4) Congress, expressing concern that disclosures of corrupt corporate practices seriously undermined public confidence in the business community and tarnished America's image abroad, enacted the FCPA.(5) To date, relatively few actions have been brought under the FCPA.(6) However, several recent high profile cases suggest that the SEC and the Department of Justice are investigating and prosecuting under the FCPA more aggressively.(7)

    The FCPA is organized around accounting and anti-bribery provisions. This article reviews the accounting provisions' record-keeping, internal controls, and intent requirements. Affirmative defenses and enforcement are also discussed. The anti-bribery provisions are also reviewed, including: (1) the definition of bribery, (2) the intent requirements, (3) permissible payments and defenses, and (4) enforcement. Finally, penalties under the FCPA and recent developments are discussed.

  3. ACCOUNTING PROVISIONS

    The FCPA amends the Securities Exchange Act ("Exchange Act")(8) by adding record-keeping and disclosure requirements for some of the entities already subject to the Exchange Act's provisions.(9)

    1. Affected Parties

      The accounting provisions apply only to issuers under the Exchange Act.(10) "Issuers" are those companies which must register with the SEC under [sections] 12 of the Exchange Act(11) and file reports under [sections] 15(d) of the Exchange Act.(12) The accounting provisions apply regardless of whether the issuer engages in foreign activities.(13)

    2. Elements of the Offense

      1. Record-keeping

        The first major requirement of the accounting provisions is that all issuers must "make and keep books, records, and accounts, which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer."(14) The term "reasonable detail" is defined by the adoption of the "prudent man" standard,(15) which means a "level of detail and degree of assurance as would satisfy prudent officials in the conduct of their own affairs."(16)

        In practice, the record-keeping provisions are used to prevent three types of improprieties: (1) a failure to record improper transactions; (2) the falsification of records to cover up improper transactions; and (3) the creation of records which are quantitatively correct, but which fail to specify the qualitative aspects of a transaction which might reveal the true purpose of a particular payment.(17) In short, records must include information which would call the SEC's attention to any possible impropriety.(18) These provisions allow the SEC both to avoid defenses such as a lack of materiality of the undisclosed activity, and to step in where there are inadequate and/or archaic accounting systems.(19)

      2. Internal Controls

        The accounting provisions also require issuers to create a system of internal accounting controls which provide reasonable assurances that transactions are properly authorized.(20) The term "reasonable assurances" is defined using the same standard as is reasonable detail in the record-keeping provisions. The internal controls provision is designed to prevent unauthorized and/or unrecorded transactions.(21)

        The SEC has specified several factors it considers when determining the adequacy of a system of internal controls.(22) These include: (1) the role of the board of directors;(23) (2) communication of corporate procedures and policies;(24) (3) assignment of authority and responsibility;(25) (4) competence and integrity of personnel;(26) (5) accountability for performance and for compliance with policies and procedures;(27) and (6) objectivity and effectiveness of the internal audit function.(28) One commentator notes that the SEC has in some cases insisted that only an audit committee set up by the board of directors can exercise "adequate control."(29)

    3. Intent

      To be found criminally liable under either of the accounting provisions, an individual must "knowingly circumvent or knowingly fail to implement a system of internal accounting controls or knowingly falsify any book, record or account."(30) This provision was added in 1988 to address the seemingly unlimited liability that the accounting provisions placed on corporate interests.(31) In addition, the term "knowing" has been construed to include conscious attempts not to know or willful blindness.(32)

    4. Affirmative Defenses

      The drafters of the FCPA included several provisions to ensure that everyday accounting deficiencies would not violate the Act. Under [sections] 78m(b)(4), no criminal liability will be imposed for technical or insignificant accounting errors.(33) Further, [sections] 78m(b)(6) provides a defense for issuers who own less than fifty percent of a business concern.(34) If the larger corporate entity used good faith in its attempts to encourage compliance with the FCPA accounting controls, the issuer is said to be discharged from responsibility for the violations of a subsidiary.(35)

    5. Enforcement

      Because the accounting provisions are codified in the Exchange Act, the SEC is responsible for their enforcement.(36) The SEC has brought enforcement actions of the accounting provisions both in cases involving actual foreign bribes and in domestic transactions.(37)

  4. ANTI-BRIBERY PROVISIONS

    The FCPA makes it illegal to bribe foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.(38) It prohibits individuals and businesses from offering, promising, or authorizing (either directly or indirectly) the payment of anything of value to any foreign official, government employee, or any person acting on behalf on any of these entities.(39) These antibribery provisions forbid direct bribes, as well as bribes made by an intermediary.(40)

    1. Affected Parties

      The anti-bribery provisions affect issuers(41) and domestic concerns.(42) Not only are the issuer and domestic concern subject to the antibribery provisions, but so are their officers, directors, stockholders, agents or employees, individually.(43) The FCPA allows for individual convictions against corporate employees regardless of whether the corporation is found guilty.(44)

      While a foreign subsidiary of a U.S. Corporation will not be subject to the FCPA, its U.S. parent may be held liable.(45) Additionally, if an employee of the foreign subsidiary fits within the definition of domestic concern, or is a U.S. national employed by the subsidiary, she may also be subject to the FCPA.(46)

      Foreign officials who receive bribes from American companies, however, remain outside the reach of the FCPA.(47) Furthermore, foreign officials cannot be prosecuted for conspiracy to violate the FCPA.(48) Foreign corporations are also beyond the reach of the FCPA.(49)

    2. Elements of the Offense

      In order to constitute a violation to the antibribery provisions of the FCPA, the following five elements must be present:(50) (1) the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce(51) in furtherance of (2) a payment or an offer to pay(52) something of value,(53) (3) to a foreign official, political party, or political candidate,(54) (4) for the corrupt(55) purpose of inducing the official to act or refrain from acting(56) (5) to assist the company in obtaining, retaining or directing business.(57)

    3. Intent

      The FCPA bans payments to third parties made "while knowing" that a portion or all of the payments will be used by the third party as bribes or for the purposes contrary to the intent of the FCPA.(58)

      Much like the accounting provisions, the "knowing" standard in the antibribery provisions includes "conscious disregard" or "willful blindness"(59) and is intended to cover those corporate officials who fail to take action when reasonable signs of a FCPA violation exist.(60) The legislative history makes clear that "knowing" in the statute includes a "conscious purpose to avoid learning the truth."(61) "Thus the 'knowing' standard covers both prohibited action taken with 'actual knowledge' of intended results as well as other actions that, while falling short of what the law terms `positive knowledge,' nevertheless evidence disregard or deliberate ignorance of known circumstances that should reasonably alert one to . . . violations of the Act."(62) Acts of "simple negligence" or "mere foolishness" are not included.(63)

    4. Permissible Payments and Defenses

      The FCPA does not prohibit all payments to foreign officials. The following discussion covers an explicit exception to the FCPA (permitting payments for routine governmental actions) and two affirmative defenses that allow a defendant to claim a payment is legal.

      1. Routine Governmental Action

        Facilitating (or "grease") payments(64) to foreign officials are permissible under the FCPA if their purpose is "to expedite or to secure the performance of a routine governmental action."(65) "Routine governmental actions" are those a foreign official ordinarily performs(66) and include obtaining permits, licenses, or documents which allow one to do business in a foreign country.(67) They also include processing governmental papers (such as visas and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex