Foreign Capital and Urban Congestion in Emerging Markets

AuthorRavi Batra,Hamid Beladi
Published date01 November 2013
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12058
Date01 November 2013
Foreign Capital and Urban Congestion in
Emerging Markets
Ravi Batra and Hamid Beladi*
Abstract
Traditional literature emphasizes the role of foreign capital, especially foreign direct investment (FDI) in
explaining the high growth rates that many emerging economies have enjoyed during 1990s and 2000s. The
present paper accepts this conventional wisdom but argues that the FDI has also created problems of urban
sprawl and congestion that would not be so intense if economic development had primarily come from
domestic sources. This is because the FDI is typically concentrated in urban areas that abound in manufac-
turing and it neglects the rural areas where agriculture predominates. The paper suggests that a small tax
on foreign capital tends to mitigate the side effects of foreign investment.
1. Introduction
Many emerging markets such as India, Ireland, Brazil, and China have made great
economic strides during 1990s and 2000s. Their growth rates have been impressive,
some routinely exceeding 8% per year. Their living standards have also risen signifi-
cantly, and foreign capital seems to have played a substantial role in their develop-
ment. In fact, a vast literature has developed to show that foreign capital, especially
foreign direct investment (FDI), has been a major force in the rapid growth of most
emerging economies. Foreign capital not only fills the critical savings gap of recipient
countries, it also provides new technology that makes labor very productive. Fre-
quently, the FDI providers help with product marketing so that goods can be
imported into developed countries. This way foreign investment brings a variety of
benefits to host nations and raises their living standards.
This is what the traditional literature emphasizes, especially the spillover effects of
FDI,1yet the emerging markets have experienced problems that may be typically
associated with capital inflows and the FDI. Urban congestion or sprawl is one such
problem, which perhaps would not have been so intense if growth had come primarily
from the use of domestic resources. Urban population growth rates have been far
greater than the growth of general population, especially in India, Singapore, and
Thailand among others. Take, for instance, the case of India, which has been well
documented by Sivaramakrishnan and Singh (2001). The authors show that over a 100
years from 1901 to 2001, India’s urban population jumped from being 11% of the
total population to as much as 28%. By 2025, this percentage is expected to rise to
42%.
Furthermore, much of the urban population growth occurred in five major cities of
Bombay, Calcutta, New Delhi, Madras, and Bangalore. These are also the cities that
have received the bulk of FDI, suggesting that the growth in FDI parallels the growth
* Beladi: University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA. E-mail: hamid.beladi@
utsa.edu. Batra: Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0100, USA. We are grateful to anony-
mous referees for constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.
Review of Development Economics, 17(4), 676–684, 2013
DOI:10.1111/rode.12058
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT