Firearm Prevalence and Homicide

AuthorMatthew D. Moore
DOI10.1177/0734016817724198
Published date01 September 2017
Date01 September 2017
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Firearm Prevalence and
Homicide: An Examination of
Urban and Suburban Counties
Matthew D. Moore
1
Abstract
Examinations of firearm prevalence and crime have produced mixed results. The mixed research
results and lack of knowledge about the amount of firearms in the United States make it difficult for
researchers to assess the role that firearm prevalence plays in crime. The current analysis argues
that the equivocal results could be due to location type because different locations may define the
use and ownership of a firearm in different ways. Densely packed urban centers may be affected by
firearm prevalence differently than sparsely populated rural areas. The current analysis created
metro, nonmetro, and rural location types to examine the relationship between firearm prevalence
and homicide. The findings illustrate that firearm prevalence significantly predicts the number of
homicides in metro counties but does not significantly predict firearm prevalence for nonmetro and
rural counties.
Keywords
ecology and crime/spatial analysis, crime/delinquency theory, violent behavior, other, crime
prevention, law enforcement/security
Research on the relationship between firearm prevalence (i.e., the number of firearms in a defined
area) and crime has produced mixed results (Branas, Richmond, Culhane, Ten Have, & Wiebe,
2009; Kleck, 1988; Kleck & Gertz, 1995; Lott, 1998; Lott & Mustard, 1997; Miller, Azrael, &
Hemenway, 2002; Moore & Bergner, 2016; Siegel, Ross, & King III, 2013). Arguments about the
role of firearm prevalence in crime are not only being made in academic settings, but by politicians
and the public, thus demonstrating the importance of this topic. However, there is no clear consensus
currently to the exact role that firearms play in crime across the United States.
To further muddle the discussion on firearm prevalence and crime, it is difficult to obtain accurate
information on the prevalence of firearms in the United States. Federal law bans the creation of a
database or some form of tracking system on firearms, and there may be wide regional differences in
firearm ownership. For instance, Azrael, Cook, and Miller (2004) estimated that the Northeast had a
1
Department of Sociology, Criminology, and Anthropology, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA
Corresponding Author:
Matthew D. Moore, Department of Sociology, Criminology, and Anthropology, University of Central Arkansas, 306I Irby
Hall, Conway, AR 72035, USA.
Email: mdmoore@uca.edu
Criminal Justice Review
2017, Vol. 42(3) 315-326
ª2017 Georgia State University
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0734016817724198
journals.sagepub.com/home/cjr

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT