A Field Study of the Presumptively Biased: Is There Empirical Support for Excluding Convicted Felons from Jury Service?

• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12027
• Date: 01 July 2014
• Published date: 01 July 2014

Erratum

A Field Study of the Presumptively Biased: Is There Empirical Support for

Excluding Convicted Felons from Jury Service?

JAMES M. BINNALL

Law & Policy 36: 1–34. DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12015

The author wishes to bring to the reader’s attention the following error in the

aforementioned paper.

On page 5, line 6

“Oregon” should have read “Colorado” in the sentence “For example, the

District of Columbia and Oregon adhere to differing hybrid models; the

former excludes convicted felons from jury service during any period of

supervision and for ten years following the termination of supervision, while

the latter excludes convicted felons solely from grand jury proceedings.”

The author would like to apologize for any inconvenience this error may have

caused.

bs_bs_banner

LAW & POLICY, Vol. 36, No. 3, July 2014 ISSN 0265–8240

© 2014 The Author

Law & Policy © 2014 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary

doi: 10.1111/lapo.12027