Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?

PositionStatestats - Brief Article

The debate over fetal rights is not new to the legislative arena. Every year pro-life and pro-choice advocates vie for the upper hand in this contentious issue.

Recent debate focuses on fetuses killed by violent acts against pregnant women. The legal approaches to dealing with such attacks involve either civil action through wrongful death laws or by increasing criminal penalties when a crime involves a pregnant woman.

Such legal action focuses on the harm done to a pregnant woman and the subsequent loss of her pregnancy, but not on the rights of the fetus.

A more controversial approach to prosecuting an assault on a pregnant woman involves defining the fetus as a person under a fetal homicide or "feticide" law. Such legislation is hotly debated under names such as the Fetal Protection Act, the Preborn Victims of Violence Act or the Unborn Victim of Violence Act. Those supporting these acts, often pro-life advocates, say that both the lives of the pregnant woman and the fetus should be explicitly protected. They assert that fetal homicide laws justly criminalize these cases and provide an opportunity to protect unborn children and their mothers.

Those on the other side fear that laws to protect a fetus could infringe on a woman's right to choose an abortion. Pro-choice advocates say such laws grant a fetus legal status distinct from the pregnant woman--possibly creating an...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT