Female labor supply, fertility rebounds, and economic development
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12411 |
Published date | 01 November 2018 |
Date | 01 November 2018 |
Author | Akira Yakita |
REGULAR ARTICLE
Female labor supply, fertility rebounds, and
economic development
Akira Yakita
Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan
Correspondence
Akira Yakita, Faculty of Economics,
Nanzan University, 18 Yamasato-cho,
Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8673, Japan.
Email: yakita@nanzan-u.ac.jp
Funding information
the Japan Society for the Promotion of
Science KAKENHI, Grant/Award
Number: 16H03635
Abstract
We show that a fertility rebound can occur as the female
wage rate rises concomitantly with economic develop-
ment. Under plausible conditions, capital accumulation
raises the marginal product of labor and hence the female
wage rate. Unless the economy is trapped in a lower
equilibrium, the fertility rate starts to decline at a certain
level of the female wage rate and then turns upward at a
higher wage level, presenting a fertility rebound. For such
fertility rebounds to appear without policy intervention,
the availability of external child care at high female wage
rates is crucially important. The external child-care price
must be lower at high female wage rates. Otherwise the
fertility rate might continue to decline.
1
|
INTRODUCTION
Fertility rebounds have been observed at higher levels of per-capita income in economically devel-
oped countries in recent decades, although the magnitudes of such rebounds vary among coun-
tries.
1
This fact contrasts against the so-called “stylized fact”that fertility declines at more
advanced stages of economic development (e.g., Galor & Weil, 1996; Galor, 2005). One convinc-
ing explanation of the rebounds is that they are the effect of family policies undertaken especially
after the 1990s (e.g., Luci-Greulich & Th
evenon, 2013). This paper presents a proposal for the
possibility of fertility rebounds without such policies, particularly addressing time-allocation deci-
sions of women and the availability of child care outside the home along with the level of eco-
nomic development.
Galor and Weil (1996) assume a physical factor of male labor which does not exist in female
labor. Men supply both physical and non-physical (mental) factors indivisibly as a unit of labor.
Because the male wage rate is higher than the female wage rate, women first spend their time on
child rearing at home; then men might do so also. Physical capital accumulation raises both female
and male wage rates, that is, the opportunity cost of child rearing at home. Incorporating the
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12411
Rev Dev Econ. 2018;22:1667–1681. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rode ©2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
|
1667
To continue reading
Request your trial