Failing multiplication: new stimulus research.

AuthorSuderman, Peter
PositionCitings

Should the federal government borrow money to jumpstart the economy in periods of high unemployment? Economists and policy makers who favor deficit-financed stimulus argue that a dollar of government spending is apt to have a bigger impact when lots of people are out of work, stimulating more than a dollar of economic activity.

Michael Owyang, Valerie Ramey, and Sarah Zubairy--economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the University of California at San Diego, and the Bank of Canada, respectively--tested that hypothesis by examining historical evidence. They found that multipliers, which indicate the amount of stimulus generated by one dollar of spending, do appear to be higher during times of slack in Canada, but not in the United States.

The researchers, who reported their results at the January meeting of the American Economic Association, looked at gross domestic product, government spending, population, and the unemployment rate from 1890 through 2010 in the U.S. and from 1921 through 2011 in Canada. They compared multipliers for periods of high unemployment--above 6.5 percent in the U.S. and above 7 percent in Canada--to multipliers for...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT