Export Competition between Landlocked and Coastal Countries: An Analysis of Strategic Export Policies

AuthorBakar Normizan,Ishii Yasunori
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12120
Published date01 November 2014
Date01 November 2014
Export Competition between Landlocked and
Coastal Countries: An Analysis of Strategic
Export Policies
Bakar Normizan and Ishii Yasunori*
Abstract
This paper analyzes economic rivalry between two firms using an international Cournot duopoly model,
where a firm from a landlocked country (LC) and a firm from a coastal country (CC) compete in a third-
country market. It is assumed that the landlocked country firm adopts a transport-cost reducing R&D sub-
sidized by its government, while the CC government imposes a toll fee on the LC firm. The findings show
since a change in the LC’s transport-cost reducing R&D subsidy has a positive effect on its export and a
negative effect on the CC’s export, both measures have effective strategic export policies.
1. Introduction
Landlocked developing countries in Central Asia, Southeast Asia and Africa have a
comparative disadvantage when exporting their products, due in part to their geo-
graphical location. As trade with nonadjacent countries needs an ocean mode, owing
to their greater distance to ports in coastal countries, landlocked countries generally
pay higher transportation costs.1In some cases, toll fees are imposed by the coastal
countries.2Thus, their geography poses a burden that affects their trade volumes, and
land transportation has limitations in transporting volumes and fragile goods.3
Because landlocked countries depend on a seaport located at coastal neighboring
countries, their economies are primarily affected not only by the high freight costs but
also by a significant unpredictability in transport time, transportation facility’s quality
and trade policies of their neighboring coastal countries.4The poor performance of
transit logistics, inefficiency of the transportation system, and the regulations, policies
and toll fees imposed by coastal countries, altogether, lead to a relatively higher cost
of transportation for landlocked countries.5Therefore, the firms and governments of
such countries have the incentives to implement certain policies for improving their
comparative advantage. Simultaneously, it can also be assumed that neighboring
coastal countries may take countermeasures against such policies. In this paper, we
analyze such international trade rivalry between landlocked and coastal countries.6
Although there are several types of trade strategies adopted by landlocked and
coastal countries in the circumstances mentioned above, this paper focuses on the
most typical case. We suppose that a landlocked country firm engages in a trans-
portation cost-reducing R&D investment involving fuel-efficient, and quantity and
* Normizan: School of Economics, Finance and Banking, University Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah,
Malaysia. Tel: +60-135921975; Fax: +60-4-9286752; E-mail: normizan@uum.edu.my. Yasunori: Graduate
School of Economics, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 169-8050. The
authors have benefited from useful comments and suggestions from anonymous referees and participants at
the 43rd Annual meeting of Canadian Economic Association held at the University of Toronto. They also
acknowledge a partial financial support from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Tech-
nology of Japan.
Review of Development Economics, 18(4), 804–812, 2014
DOI:10.1111/rode.12120
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT