Exploring the Gaps in Programming for Men and Women with a Gambling Disorder in the Correctional System in Canada

AuthorFarah Jindani,Steve Cook,Jing Shi,Steve McAvoy,Chris Myers,Flora I. Matheson,Mark van der Maas,Sherald Sanchez,Peter Ferentzy,Nigel E. Turner
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211013743
Published date01 October 2022
Date01 October 2022
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211013743
International Journal of
Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology
2022, Vol. 66(13-14) 1366 –1386
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X211013743
journals.sagepub.com/home/ijo
Article
Exploring the Gaps in
Programming for Men and
Women with a Gambling
Disorder in the Correctional
System in Canada
Farah Jindani1,2, Steve Cook3, Jing Shi1,
Steve McAvoy1, Chris Myers4, Flora I. Matheson5,6,
Mark van der Maas7, Sherald Sanchez1,
Peter Ferentzy1, and Nigel E. Turner1,6
Abstract
The prevalence of problem gambling in the correctional system is about 10 times
higher than in the general population, but programming for gambling problems in the
correctional system is scarce. Examined barriers to treatment for problem gamblers
in the correctional system, sex or gender differences, and options for program
design. We conducted interviews with 16 experts who had worked with problem
gamblers in the correctional system and analyzed the data in terms of themes. For
barriers, the experts discussed a lack of awareness about problem gambling, as well
as stigmatization and lockdowns. Experts described the content of current programs
as equally applicable to both men and women, but that emotional components
were more important for women. Finally, the experts had mixed views on whether
programming should be integrated with other programs such as substance abuse.
Programming implications for this population are discussed.
1Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
2Seneca college, Toronto
3University of Michigan, USA
4Addiction & Mental Health Services—Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington, ON, Canada
5St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
6University of Toronto, ON, Canada
7Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Corresponding Author:
Nigel E. Turner, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health,
33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2S1, Canada.
Email: nigel.turner@camh.ca
1013743IJOXXX10.1177/0306624X211013743International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyJindani et al.
research-article2021
Jindani et al. 1367
Keywords
problem gambling, offenders, treatment, criminal behavior, qualitative research,
correctional system
Introduction
In a review of the literature on gambling problems amongst people with criminal jus-
tice involvement (P-CJI) Williams et al. (2005) found that the prevalence for both men
and women ranged from 17% to 60%, with an average of around 33% across all sam-
ples. Williams et al. (2005) define problem gamblers as including both Disordered
Gamblers (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) as well as sub-clinical
cases. These data were collected mostly in the UK, Australia, and the USA. Similar
prevalence estimates have been found in more recent studies in the UK (May-Chahal
et al., 2012) and in Canada (Turner et al., 2009, 2013b). For example, Turner et al.
(2009, 2013b) found that nearly one quarter of P-CJI in Canada had a gambling prob-
lem including 9% who had a Gambling Disorder according to DSM-5 criteria (Turner
et al., 2016). These figures are up to 10 times higher than those found in the general
population (Turner et al., 2013b). Nonetheless there is a lack of treatment services for
P-CJI with gambling problems. The purpose of this paper is to explore the barriers and
other issues related to providing treatment and prevention services for P-CJI with
gambling problems in the correctional system in Canada. To do this we interviewed a
panel of experts who work with problem gamblers in the correctional system.
Research indicates that income-generating crimes such as theft and fraud are
most often associated with a gambling disorder (Adolphe et al., 2019; Turner et al.,
2009), suggesting that some people who gamble may engage in criminal behavior
when legal sources of paying off debts become exhausted (Lesieur & Custer, 1984).
Studies have shown that problem gamblers were most likely to report having engaged
in income-producing crimes such as theft, break and entry, and fraud (Adolphe et al.,
2019; Brown, 1987; Turner et al., 2009). However, some gamblers also engage in
violent crimes (Adolphe et al., 2019). The cyclical nature of gambling and criminal
behavior was summarized succinctly by one incarcerated person with problematic
gambling, who stated that “gambling leads to debt, debt leads to crime, and around
it goes” (Turner et al., 2009). Criminal behavior may be a result of a number of fac-
tors such as a lack of self-control, opportunity, social inequity, or other factors
(Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990; Grasmick et al., 1993; Rufrancos et al., 2013; Welte
et al., 2004). However, it is argued that a gambling problem may increase crimino-
genic and recidivism risk (Meyer & Fabian, 1992; Robinson et al., 2001; Turner
et al., 2009, 2013b; Williams et al., 2005). In addition, research on correctional treat-
ment has generally shown problem gambling treatment programs to reduce recidi-
vism (Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005).
Individuals entering the Canadian correctional systems currently undergo a battery
of questionnaires at intake to assess their risk, need, and responsivity (RNR) (Andrews
et al., 1986; Bonta & Andrews, 2007; Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005; Motiuk, 1997),
but none of these tools assess problem gambling as either a direct or indirect risk

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT