Exchange Rate Challenges in Emerging Markets and Developing Countries—Introduction

Date01 August 2015
Published date01 August 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12166
AuthorGunther Schnabl,Ansgar Belke
Exchange Rate Challenges in Emerging Markets and
Developing Countries—Introduction
Ansgar Belke and Gunther Schnabl*
Since the 1990s recurring financial crises in Japan, the USA and Europe have trig-
gered an unprecedented monetary expansion in the large industrialized countries.
This monetary expansion took the form of money market interest rates converging
towards zero and unconventional monetary policies inflating the balance sheets of the
central banks in the core of the international monetary system that issues the leading
international currencies (dollar, euro and yen).
With the low-cost liquidity issued in the large industrialized countries the emerging
market economies and developing countries became destinations for increasingly
speculative capital flows (hunt for yield), which undermined more independent mon-
etary policy making (Belke and Verheyen, 2014). As within an environment of very
benign global liquidity conditions the move towards a flexible exchange rate is equiva-
lent to a quasi-announced appreciation of the national currency (McKinnon and
Schnabl, 2009), the famous trilemma in international economics has become trans-
formed into a dilemma: Emerging market economies and developing countries have
de facto lost a degree of freedom in choosing between exchange rate stability and
monetary policy independence (Rey, 2013).
The resulting tremendous foreign reserve accumulation of emerging markets and
developing countries, which has become widely independent from the exchange rate
regime, is the breeding ground for financial instability as observed in the wake of the
1997/98 Asian crisis. By then, buoyant capital inflows, widely unsterilized foreign
reserve accumulation and undue credit growth had become the source of
unsustainable financial market exuberance, overinvestment, rising current account
deficits, and balance of payments and financial market crisis.
To prevent a recurrence of the Asian crisis, East Asian countries moved towards
extensive sterilization policies. Sterilization operations can be market based or non-
market based. In the case of market-based sterilization central banks absorb liquidity
from financial markets at market rates. The benefit is that the market mechanism
remains in place, but interest rates are pushed upwards, which attracts additional
(speculative) capital inflows. In addition, substantial sterilization costs can accrue,
which undermines the independence of the central bank.
Therefore non-market-based sterilization operations have become more prevalent,
which keeps the sterilization costs low. For instance, the Peoples Bank of China is
forcing commercial banks to keep increasing reserves with the central bank, with the
growing reserve requirements being remunerated below market rates. The benefit of
non-market-based sterilization is that sterilization costs for the central bank are low
* Belke: Jean Monnet Professor for Macroeconomics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße
12, 45117 Essen, Germany. Tel: +49-(0)201-1832277; E-mail: ansgar.belke@uni-due.de. Also affiliated to
CEPS Brussels and IZA Bonn. Schnabl: University of Leipzig, Institute for Economic Policy, Grimmaische
Straße 12, 04109 Leipzig, Germany. Also affiliated to CESifo Munich.
Review of Development Economics, 19(3), 449–454, 2015
DOI:10.1111/rode.12166
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT