Examining Trials and Grand Jury Hearings

AuthorRobert K. Gill/Mark G. Daniel
Pages361-392
11-1
CHAPTER 11
EXAMINING TRIALS AND
GRAND JURY HEARINGS
I. Examining Trials
§11:01 In General
§11:02 Motion for Examining Trial
II. Grand Juries
A. Grand Jury Impaneling
1. Equal Protection and Fair Cross-Section Violations
§11:10 Statutory Law
§11:11 Violation Occurs When Identifiable Group Is Excluded
§11:12 Defendant’s Standing
§11:13 Elements of Violation
2. Challenging the Array
§11:20 Statutory Law
§11:21 Challenge Must Be When the Array Is Impaneled
3. Quashing the Indictment Based on Improper Selection
§11:30 Statutory Law
§11:31 Time to Challenge
§11:32 Burden of Proof
§11:33 Remedy
4. Improperly Constituted Grand Jury
§11:40 Statutory Law
§11:41 Challenge to a Particular Juror
§11:42 Personal Information About Grand Jurors
§11:42.1 Statutory Law
Texas Criminal Forms 11-2
B. Grand Jury Conduct
1. Improper Questioning of Grand Jury Witness
§11:50 Statutory Law
§11:51 Case Law
§11:52 Analysis of Whether Error Is Harmless
2. Improper Person Present With Grand Jury
§11:60 Statutory Law
§11:61 Improper Person Requires New Trial
3. Improper Return of Indictment
§11:70 Statutory Law
C. Endorsement of Witness Names on Indictment
§11:80 Statutory Law
§11:81 Defendant Can Learn Who Testified
D. Representing the Defendant
§11:90 Statutory Law
E. Transcripts of Grand Jury Testimony
§11:100 Statutory Law
§11:101 Defendant Must Show Particularized Need for Testimony
F. Defendant’s Testimony
§11:110 Suppressing Testimony
§11:111 Motion in Limine Evidence of Defendant’s Grand Jury Testimony
III. DNA Collection After Indictment
§11:120 Statutory Law
§11:121 Motion for DNA Collection
IV. Forms
Form 11-1 Motion for Examining Trial (Requesting Discharge of Defendant)
Form 11-2 Motion for Examining Trial (Requesting Reasonable Bond)
Form 11-3.1 Motion for Examining Trial (Defendant Transferred From Juvenile Court)
Form 11-3.2 Motion to Exclude Examining Trial Testimony of Defendant
Form 11-3.3 Motion to Suppress Examining Trial Testimony of Witness
Form 11-4 Challenge to the Array
Form 11-5 Motion to Quash Indictment Based on Improper Grand Jury Selection
Form 11-6 Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Indictment Based on Improper Grand
Jury Selection
Form 11-7.1 Motion to Challenge a Particular Grand Juror
Form 11-7.2 Motion for Disclosure of Personal Information About Grand Jurors
Form 11-8 Motion to Quash Indictment Due to Improper Grand Jury Conduct
Form 11-9 Motion to Quash Indictment Due to Improper Person Present
Form 11-10 Motion to Quash Indictment Due to Insufficient Number of Votes
Form 11-11 Motion to Require Endorsement of Names of Grand Jury Witnesses on Indictment
Form 11-12 Request for Defense Attorney to Appear at Grand Jury
Form 11-13 Letter for Grand Jurors in Lieu of Appearance by Attorney
Form 11-14 Motion for Production of Grand Jury Transcript
Form 11-15 Brief in Support of Motion for Production of Grand Jury Transcript
Form 11-16 Motion to Suppress Grand Jury Testimony of Defendant
Form 11-17 Motion in Limine (Evidence of Defendant’s Statement)
Form 11-18 State’s Motion for DNA Collection After Indictment
11-3 examining Trials and grand Jury hearings §11:10
I. EXAMINING TRIALS
§11:01 In General
An examining trial is a hearing before a mag-
istrate for the purpose of determining: (1) whether
the state has probable cause to hold the defendant
under the felony accusation, and the amount of bail
which the defendant shall be required to post; or
(2) whether the defendant shall be discharged. Tex.
Code Crim. Pro. Arts. 16.01 and 16.17. Taylor v.
State, 671 S.W.2d 535 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st
Dist.] 1983, no pet.).
PRACTICE TIP:
In most situations, the filing of a motion for
examining trial will result in expedited indict-
ment of the defendant because the return of
an indictment terminates the defendant’s right
to an examining trial. White v. State, 576
S.W.2d 843 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); De Leon v.
State, 758 S.W.2d 621 (Tex.App.—Houston
[14th Dist.] 1988, no pet.).
The same rules of evidence that govern final
trials govern examining trials. Tex. Code Crim.
Pro. Art. 16.07. However, the Rules of Evidence
are not applicable to hearings on justification for
pre-trial detention not involving bail. Tex.R. Evid.
101(d)(1)(F).
PRACTICE TIP:
Make all objections to the method of conduct-
ing the examining trial (such as lack of confron-
tation, lack of adequate cross-examination) at
the examining trial itself or they are waived.
Wilkins v. State, 818 S.W.2d 844 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, pet. ref’d).
For further case law on examining trials, see
Texas Criminal Lawyers Handbook §§11:10-11:30.
§11:02 Motion for Examining Trial
An examining trial can be requested for one of
three reasons:
To obtain discharge of the defendant due to
insufficient probable cause to sustain the charged
offense. Tex. Code Crim. Pro. Art. 16.01.
To obtain reasonable bond for the defendant
from a judge or magistrate. Tex. Code Crim.
Pro. Art. 16.01.
To aid in the discovery process for a defen-
dant transferred from a juvenile to adult
court under Tex.Fam.Code §54.02.
FORM: See the following at the end of this chapter:
Form 11-1 Motion for Examining Trial
(Requesting Discharge of Defendant).
Form 11-2 Motion for Examining Trial
(Requesting Reasonable Bond).
Form 11-3.1 Motion for Examining Trial
(Defendant Transferred From Juvenile Court).
Form 11-3.2 Motion to Exclude Examining
Trial Testimony of Defendant.
Form 11-3.3 Motion to Suppress Examining
Trial Testimony of Witness.
[§§11:03-11:09 Reserved]
II. GRAND JURIES
A. GrAnd Jury iMpAnelinG
1. Equal Protection and Fair Cross-
Section Violations
§11:10 Statutory Law
Tex. Code Crim. Pro. Art. 19.06. Shall Select
Grand Jurors
The jury commissioners shall select not
less than 15 nor more than 40 persons
from the citizens of the county to be sum-
moned as grand jurors for the next term of
court, or the term of court for which said
commissioners were selected to serve, as
directed in the order of the court selecting
the commissioners. The commissioners
shall, to the extent possible, select grand
jurors who the commissioners determine
represent a broad cross-section of the
population of the county, considering the
factors of race, sex, and age. A commis-
sioner is not qualified to be selected for or
to serve as a grand juror during the term of
court for which the commissioner is serving
as a commissioner.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT