Examining the behavioral and structural characteristics of team leadership in extreme environments

Date01 July 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/job.2290
AuthorMarissa L. Shuffler,Christopher W. Wiese,C. Shawn Burke
Published date01 July 2018
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
Examining the behavioral and structural characteristics of team
leadership in extreme environments
C. Shawn Burke
1
|Marissa L. Shuffler
2
|Christopher W. Wiese
3
1
University of Central Florida, Orlando,
Florida, U.S.A.
2
Clemson University, Clemson, South
Carolina, U.S.A.
3
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
Georgia, U.S.A.
Correspondence
C. Shawn Burke, University of Central Florida,
Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
Email: sburke@ist.ucf.edu
Funding information
Johnson Space Center, Grant/Award Number:
NNX14AK54G; NASA, Grant/Award Number:
NNX14AK54G
Summary
Despite the growing interest in extreme teams, there is currently a lack of under-
standing concerning leadership within such teams, as the literature has predominantly
focused on team leadership within the context of traditional organizations. The
current study investigates team leadership within the context of teams operating in
extreme environments, with a specific focus on teams operating in isolated, confined
environments. We seek to identify team leadership functions as well as a subset of
structural characteristics associated with team leadership in extreme environments
(i.e., formality of leadership, locus of leadership, and leadership distribution). We
leverage a historiometric approach to capitalize on real historical examples of extreme
teams that are rich with critical information regarding actual team leadership functions
occurring in extreme settings. Results suggest that team leadership functions such as
team problem solving, supporting social climate, structure and planning, and
sensemaking are among the most prevalent. Results also indicated that the degree
to which leadership is distributed throughout the team as well as the formality of
leadership varies across action and transition phases of the team's task cycle.
KEYWORDS
extreme environments, team leadership, teams
1|INTRODUCTION
The greatest leader is not necessarily the one who does
the greatest things. He is the one who gets the people
to do the greatest things (President Ronald Reagan)
Space exploration teams, polar exploration teams, longduration
sailboat racing teams, mountaineering teams, and provincial recon-
struction teams; what is the uniting factor among all these teams?
They are extreme teams. In essence, extreme teams are teams that
(a) complete their tasks in performance environments with one or
more contextual features that are atypical in level (e.g., extreme time
pressure) or kind (e.g., confinement, danger) and (b) for which ineffec-
tive performance has serious consequences …” (Bell, Fisher, Brown, &
Mann, 2016, p. 2). Extreme team members are exposed to atypically
high levels of stressors that (a) appear in combination simultaneously
and (b) may be a mixture of chronic and acute in nature. The broader
literature on teams operating in what can be considered extreme con-
texts indicates that teams will often fail under such conditionssuch
intense, continuously stressful situations can emphasize a focus on
self, decrease team perspective, decrease prosocial behaviors, and
negatively impact team decisionmaking processes (Driskell & Salas,
1991; Driskell, Salas, & Johnston, 1999). Due to the critical nature of
extreme team performance, there have been repeated calls for more
research to facilitate an understanding of the factors that contribute
to team effectiveness within such environments (Bell et al., 2016;
Friedrich, Vessey, Schuelke, Ruark, & Mumford, 2009; Hannah,
Campbell, & Matthews, 2010; Keeton, Schmidt, Slack, & Malka, 2012).
One element that has been argued to play a critical role in
extreme team effectiveness is team leadership (e.g., Mulhearn et al.,
2016; Crosby, 2008; Hannah, UhlBien, Avolio, & Cavarretta, 2009).
The purpose of leadership in any given team is to establish goals and
set direction that will lead to accomplishing these goals (Zaccaro,
Rittman, & Marks, 2001). Previous research suggests that team
Received: 16 February 2017 Revised: 21 February 2018 Accepted: 29 March 2018
DOI: 10.1002/job.2290
716 Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J Organ Behav. 2018;39:716730.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/job

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT