Evidence‐Informed Program Improvement: Using Principles of Effectiveness to Enhance the Quality and Impact of Family‐Based Prevention Programs

AuthorCailin O’Connor,Siobhan M. Cooney,Stephen A. Small
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00530.x
Date01 February 2009
Published date01 February 2009
STEPHEN A. SMALL,SIOBHAN M. COONEY,AND CAILIN O’CONNOR
University of Wisconsin—Madison
Evidence-Informed Program Improvement: Using
Principles of Effectiveness to Enhance the Quality
and Impact of Family-Based Prevention Programs
In recent years, federal, state, and local govern-
ments and other funding organizations have
increased pressure for greater effectiveness and
accountability of prevention programs, includ-
ing those oriented toward families. This rising
demand for program accountability has fueled
a growing interest in evidence-based programs.
Drawing on what is known about evidence-
based prevention programs, we discuss some
common principles of effective programs and
present a process for how practitioners can
use these principles to improve the quality
and impact of existing family programs. We
term this approach evidence-informed program
improvement.
In recent years, federal, state, and local govern-
ments and other funding organizations have
increased pressure for greater effectiveness and
accountability of prevention programs, espe-
cially those targeting the needs of children, youth,
and families (Kyler, Bumbarger, & Greenberg,
2004). This rising demand for program account-
ability has fueled a growing interest in evidence-
based programs (EBPs). EBPs are well-def‌ined
programs that have demonstrated their eff‌icacy
through rigorous, peer-reviewed evaluations and
have been endorsed by government agencies and
well-respected research organizations. EBPs are
not simply characterized by known effectiveness;
they are also well documented so that they are
more easily disseminated (Cooney, Huser, Small,
& O’Connor, 2007). EBPs can be distinguished
from evidence-based practices, which are com-
monly def‌ined as theintegration of the best avail-
able research evidencewith clinical expertise and
client values (American Psychological Associa-
tion, 2001). Evidence-based practices are most
commonlyused in conjunction with individualcli-
ents and are not necessarily part of a larger pro-
gram. In contrast, EBPs usually have an
identif‌iablecurriculum and comprisean organized
series of practices, activities, and strategies, some
of which might be considered evidence-based
practices.
There are numerous advantages to imple-
menting EBPs with children, youth, and their
families (Center for Substance Abuse Preven-
tion, 1999; Cooney, Huser, et al., 2007; Kyler
et al., 2004). First, the use of EBPs can help or-
ganizations obtain and sustain program funding.
Not only do funders increasingly want to invest
their dollars in programs that have scientif‌ically
demonstrated their effectiveness, but the public
also wants to know that tax dollars are being
spent on programs and services that actually
work. A related advantage to implementing
EBPs is that they are more likely than other pro-
grams for youth and families to have undergone
Human Development & Family Studies at the University of
Wisconsin—Madison, 1300 Linden Drive, Madison, WI
53706 (sasmall@wisc.edu).
Key Words: best practices, evidence-based practice, evidence-
based programs, family programs, prevention, program devel-
opment.
Family Relations 58 (February 2009): 1–13 1
A Publication of
the National Council on
Family Relations

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT