The Evidence of Things Not Seen: Non-Matches as Evidence of Innocence

Author:James S. Liebman - Shawn Blackburn - David Mattern - Jonathan Waisnor
Position:Professor, Columbia Law School - J.D., Columbia Law School, 2011 - J.D. Candidate, Columbia Law School, 2013 - J.D., Columbia Law School, 2012
Pages:577-688
SUMMARY

Exonerations famously reveal that eyewitness identifications, confessions, and other "direct" evidence can be false, though police and jurors greatly value them. Exonerations also reveal that "circumstantial" non-matches between culprit and defendant can be telling evidence of innocence (e.g., an aspect of an eyewitness’s description of the perpetrator that does not match the suspect she... (see full summary)


    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      Read this document for free by creating your vLex Open account
    • FREE SIGN UP