Europe, United States and others aim to boost biofuels, but obstacles remain

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/oet.12728
Date01 September 2019
Published date01 September 2019
FOCUS
Europe, United States and others aim to boost biofuels,
but obstacles remain
Biofuels are an often-overlooked part of the energy mix, but
are rising in importance as climate change moves up the
agenda and the volumes involve grow. This summer saw the
United States remove restrictions on summer use of E15 gas-
oline (with 15% bioethanol), resulting in protests from oil
refiners, but also expanding the market for corn feedstock
helping US farmers offset the impact of trade constraint with
China. Elsewhere, in Europe, policymakers are struggling to
push up the biofuel portion, although the Netherlands' recent
adoption of E10 could spur more widespread use. Without
such a move, the United Kingdom, for one, is likely to miss
its transportation decarbonization target for 2020. Elsewhere,
China is also likely to miss modest targets, while Brazil and
some other South American countries continue to lead the
pack with blends of up to 100%.
Bioethanol, together with biodiesel and other forms of
bioenergy (biomass, biogas, wood, and charcoal), represent
by far the largest proportion of renewable energy used
worldwide: Modern bioenergy is [an] overlooked giant,
the IEA's executive director Fatih Birol said in March this
year. Its share in the world's total renewables consumption
is about 50% today, as much as hydro, wind, solar and all
other renewables combined.However, many biofuels add
carbon indirectly or compete with wilderness and food crops
for landoffsetting their green credentials; something Mr
Birol did not dwell on. Advanced biofuels, from sources as
diverse as used cooking oil and genetically modified algae,
are greener but more expensive and add to the complexity.
Ambitious carbon emissions targets are the most common
reason governments mandate greater use of biofuels in gaso-
line and diesel. However, other factors are also involved,
including availability of cheap and plentiful cropsas in
South America, where biofuel use is highest. In the United
States, energy security was initially the driver of biofuel pol-
icy, rather than carbon emissions. But now it is the agricul-
tural lobby that has taken over as the driving force, battling
it out with oil refinery lobbyists for the ear of lawmakers.
Another factor having an impact on adoption is the rela-
tive price of gasoline and other oil products compared to
biofuels. When oil prices fell from late 2014, biofuels were
put at a disadvantage, which held back their advance for sev-
eral years in some areas. Now that oil prices have recovered
somewhat, that commercial advantage has been eroded,
helping biofuels to gain ground once more. The price differ-
ential between biofuel feedstocks and the benchmark heating
oil futures contract is known as the bohospread or factor.
1
After turning positive in November 2014, it switched back
to negative recently. Farming interest in the United States
claim these relative price moves mean ethanol mandates
from the federal government are critical to ensure a stable
market.
In Europe the main motivation to add biofuels is environ-
mental (to reduce carbon emissions), but resistance has also
been largely on environmental and social grounds, with
critics claiming fuel feedstock crops impinge on both food
crops (pushing up prices) and unfarmed land. Nevertheless,
in a number of European countries, consumption of gasoline
blends with 10% ethanol is growing (see below), as individ-
ual states gradually implement legislation to meet EU-wide
targets. Problems remain, including the different way of
implementing biofuel directives across Europe.
1|EUROPEAN BIOETHANOL
EDGES UP
Biofuel demand in Europe is driven by EU-wide targets
under the Renewable Energy Directive and Fuel Quality
Directive, which are implemented differently in each mem-
ber state. Some countries have blending mandates on a vol-
ume basis, others on an energy basis, and some have opted
for a greenhouse gas reduction target. A few countries, such
as the Netherlands, allow for waste-based biofuels to count
double toward their obligation.
Most countries are currently at around a 5% bioethanol
blend, and while new higher blends are being introduced in
various European countries, they are becoming increasingly
difficult to comply with because of restrictions on the type of
feedstocks that can be used (see below). But, without higher
biofuel cuts, it is difficult to see how short-term (2020)
DOI: 10.1111/oet.12728
4© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Oil and Energy Trends. 2019;44:413.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/oet

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT