Ethos Prototypes: The Intersection of Rhetoric, Cognition, and Communicating Health Policy Internationally
Date | 01 December 2019 |
Published date | 01 December 2019 |
Author | Kirk St.Amant |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.323 |
464
doi: 10.1002/wmh3.323
© 2019 Policy Studies Organization
Ethos Prototypes: The Intersection of Rhetoric, Cognition,
and Communicating Health Policy Internationally
Kirk St.Amant
Effective health and medical policy implementation in international contexts is a complex process.
Success often reflects effective communication practices. Credibility is often a key to
achieving such objectives. Cultures, however, can have differing credibility expectations that can affect
these communication and policy implementation processes. Individuals working in such contexts can
benefit from mechanisms that can facilitate credible communication in health and medical policy
contexts. This entry overviews one such mechanism, that of ethos prototypes.
KEY WORDS: culture, ethos, prototype
Introduction
In global contexts, effective communication is essential to addressing public
health issues. For such dynamics to work, all parties need to quickly recognize key
policy documents and readily accept them as credible sources of information.
Individuals who craft policy‐related documents must, therefore, understand how
cultural factors can affect the international exchange of ideas. Approaches that assist
such practices can contribute to coordinating international policy efforts
relating to health and medicine. This entry presents one such approach—that of
ethos prototypes—for crafting policy documentation for international environments.
Of Credibility and Culture
Effective communication involves more than understanding. It also encompasses
acceptance and agreement—both of which connect to credibility. If I understand
your argument, but I do not consider it credible, I will not act on the information
you’ve provided. Likewise, my perception of your credibility also affects my
agreement to act—or my accepting your information as valid and your proposed
course of action as worth undertaking. Such factors are important to crafting policy
documents audiences understand, accept, and agree to act on to achieve public
health objectives (e.g., contain a disease outbreak).
To continue reading
Request your trial