Estimating JP Morgan Chase's Profits From the Madoff Deposits

Date01 March 2011
AuthorLinus Wilson,Louis R. Davis
Published date01 March 2011
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2011.01196.x
C
Risk Management and Insurance Review, 2011, Vol.14, No. 1, 107-119
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6296.2011.01196.x
ESTIMATING JP MORGAN CHASESPROFITS
FROM THE MADOFF DEPOSITS
Louis R. Davis
Linus Wilson
ABSTRACT
JP Morgan Chase had deposits from Bernard L. Madoff’s investors totaling $5.5
billion at one point in 2008. The Chase account was supposedly where most
of the funds in his Ponzi scheme were deposited. Any large deposit can be a
considerable source of profit to a bank. Assuming that the deposits returned
the bank’s net interest margin and grew at a random geometric rate, this article
estimates that JP Morgan Chase generated $435 million in after-tax profits from
this very large account over the course of 16 years. With JP Morgan Chase the
target of pending lawsuits relating to the Madoff fraud, this article’s method-
ology and results may be of interest to litigants, prosecutors, journalists, and
academics.
INTRODUCTION
Banks are in the primary business of taking deposits and lending out the proceeds of
their deposits at higher interest rates to individuals and businesses. Any long-term large
deposit for a bank can be very profitable. This article estimates, based on court filings,
that JP Morgan Chase earned after-tax profits for their shareholderstotaling $435 million
dollars from 1993 to 2008 from the billions of dollars deposited in the bank as part of
the Madoff Ponzi scheme. Without detailed account records, these estimates should be
treated with some caution. Nevertheless, with suits pending relating to the JP Morgan
Chase account in the name of Bernard Madoff Investment Securities (BMIS), this article
indicates that JP Morgan Chase’s shareholders may have profited in the short run if
Chase’s bankers ignored warning signs about that account. Yet, the authors suspect
that JP Morgan Chase’s shareholders now wish that Madoff had put his deposits in a
competitor’s bank.
Louis R. Davis is an Adjunct Instructor in Business Law, University of Louisiana at
Lafayette, B. I. Moody III College of Business, Department of Marketing and Hospitality,
214 Hebrard Boulevard, Moody Hall 255, Lafayette, LA 70504-3490; phone: 337-482-5762;
e-mail: lrd9575@louisiana.edu. Linus Wilson is an Assistant Professor of Finance, Univer-
sity of Louisiana at Lafayette, B. I. Moody III College of Business, Department of Eco-
nomics and Finance, 214 Hebrard Boulevard, Moody Hall 253, P. O. Box 44570, Lafayette,
LA 70504-4570; phone: 337-482-6209; fax: (337) 482-6675; e-mail: linuswilson@louisiana.edu,
Web: http://www.linuswilson.com. This article was subject to double-blind peer review.
107

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT