Erratum

• DOI: 10.1177/0093854807302681
• Published date: 01 May 2007
• Date: 01 May 2007
• Subject Matter: Articles

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, Vol. 34,No. 5, May 2007 713

DOI: 10.1177/0093854807302681

© 2007 American Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology

713

ERRATUM

In the April 2007 issue of Criminal Justice and Behavior, in the article titled “Taking

Stock of Criminal Profiling: A Narrative Review and Meta-analysis” by Brent Snook,

Joseph Eastwood, Paul Gendreau, Claire Goggin, and Richard M. Cullen, Table 2 should

have appeared as follows:

TABLE 2: Effect Sizes for Self-Labeled Profiler/Experienced-Investigators Versus Comparison Groups

Outcome

(k) n

Meanr

(SD)

95% CIr

z

+95% CIz+

Overall offender (30) 981 .24 (.42) .08–.40 .08 .01–.15

Cognitive processes (14) 720a−.06 (.20) −.18–.06 −.07 −.15–.01

Physical attributes (14) 720a.10 (.26) −.05–.25 .13 .05–.21

Offence behaviors (14) 720a.00 (.16) −.09–.09 .02 −.06–.10

History/Habits (14) 720a−.09 (.28) −.25–.07 −.10 −.18– −.02

Note:

Mean

r

(

SD

) =mean Pearson correlation coefficient for each predictor with standard deviations in paren-

theses; 95% CI

r

=confidence intervals about

r

;

z+

=[(

zr

) ×(

n

– 3)] ÷ (

N

– 3) per predictor, where

n

=number of

participants per effect size and

N

=number of participants per predictor; 95% CIz+=confidence interval about

z+

.

aIndicates that the sample size for each of the subscales is identical as they were taken from three studies writ-

ten by the same author (all groups in these studies were tested along these predictors).