Erratum

• Published date: 01 September 2008
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00136.x
• Date: 01 September 2008

Erratum

In the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4:3 (2007), the following errors

were published in “Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining

the White-Male Effect in Risk Perception”:

The Note to Table 2 should read:

Dependent variable is Environmental-Risk Perception. Coefficients are semi-

partial correlation coefficients. ***pⱕ0.05; *pⱕ0.10. For the religious

affiliation dummy variables, Protestantism is the reference category.

Figure 6 curves were mislabeled. The correct labels should read:

Nonwhite women: y =3.1 -.14 ¥Individualism

White women: y =4.04 -.58 ¥Individualism

Nonwhite men: y =4.61 -.73 ¥Individualism

White men: y =5-.95 ¥Individualism

Reference:

Dan M. Kahan, Donald Braman, John Gastil, Paul Slovic, C. K. Mertz (2007) Culture

and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White-Male Effect in Risk

Perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3), 465–505 doi:10.1111/j.1740-

1461.2007.00097.x

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Volume 5, Issue 3, 645, September 2008

645