Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and Other Indo-Aryan Languages.

• Author: Hinuber, O. V.
• Position: Review

Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in sanskrit, Prakrit, and Other Indo-Aryan Languages. By RICHARD SALOMON. New York: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1998. Pp. xxi + 378, figs., maps. $65.

The book, aptly dedicated to the memory of Dinesh Chandra Sircar (1907-85), sets its aim with somewhat exaggerated modesty as being merely to supplement Sircar's Indian Epigraphy (1965). In fact it will supersede the earlier book to a very large extent, not only because it gives updated information on the study of Indian epigraphy, but also in richness of material, systematic arrangement, and balanced judgment on the many facets of problems surrounding this topic.

The handbook, which is divided into eight parts (scope and significance of epigraphy: writing and script; language; survey of inscriptions; methods; history of Indian epigraphy; epigraphy as a source for Indian culture; bibliographic survey) and supplemented by a selection of typical inscriptions, covers a wide range of inscribed materials. For, wisely, the term "epigraphy" is employed in a rather loose sense allowing inclusion not only of stone inscriptions, the classical field of epigraphy, but also of clay, wood, or other surfaces written on. Only coins are excluded (p. viii).

The book begins with a lengthy discussion of the thorny subject of the introduction of writing in India, which seemed to have taken a new turn with the supposed pre-Mauryan potsherds inscribed with extremely brief sequences of letters (which do not even allow us to be really certain about the language) found in a very thin layer immediately below a Maurya horizon in Ceylon. Consequently, it may be wise to follow Salomon's suggestion (p. 12) that these are "intrusive potsherds" really belonging to the Mauryan layer. Moreover, as far as sources are available, the well-known oldest epigraphs remain the Asokan inscriptions, supported by textual evidence: references to script are absent from the oldest Buddhist and other texts, but abound in texts of (post-) Mauryan origin. It would not be easy to account for this double absence of script in direct and indirect evidence by assuming that all pre-Mauryan written records supposed to exist have perished, and at the same time that no literary text of that period, neith er Vedic nor Buddhist nor Jain, mentions them.

After describing the different scripts used, with emphasis on the oldest Brahmi and Kharosthi, (1) special forms of script are discussed, such as...