INTRODUCTION A. Criminal versus Civil Penalties B. Enforcement C. Interaction with Other Criminal Violations II. GENERAL ISSUES A. Overview of Elements of Environmental Criminal Violations B. Liability 1. Corporate Liability 2. Individual Liability C. Common Defenses 1. Constitutional Defenses 2. Other Defenses D. Voluntary Compliance and Sentencing E. Sentencing Guidelines III. CLEAN AIR ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of CAA Offense 1. Violation a. Emissions Standards i. National Ambient Air Quality Standards ii. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants iii. New Source Performance Standards iv. Acid Deposition Regulation v. Stratospheric Ozone Protection b. EPA Monitoring of Emissions Standards 2. Intent C. Defenses D. Penalties IV. CLEAN WATER ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of a CWA Offense 1. Violation a. Effluent Limitations and Water Quality Standards; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit Program b. Monitoring, Reporting, and Regulatory Searches c. Discharge of Oil and Hazardous Substances d. Prohibition on Dredge and Fill Activities 2. Intent C. Defenses D. Penalties 1. Penalties Under the CWA a. Negligent Violations b. Knowing Violations c. Knowing Endangerment d. False Statements, Representations, and Tampering 2. Penalties Under the Sentencing Guidelines V. THE RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT OF 1899 A. Purpose B. Elements of an RHA Offense 1. Violation 2. Intent C. Defenses D. Penalties VI. SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of SDWA Offense 1. Underground Injection of Contaminants a. Elements of the Offense b. Penalties 2. Regulation of Drinking Water Coolers a. Elements of the Offense b. Penalties 3. Enforcement of Ban on Tampering a. Elements of the Offense b. Penalties VII. COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of a CERCLA Offense C. Defenses D. Penalties VIII. RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of a RCRA Offense 1. Violation 2. Intent a. Knowing Violation b. Knowing Endangerment C. Defenses D. Penalties IX. Toxic SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of a TSCA Offense 1. Violation a. Testing Requirements b. Notice and Premanufacturing Approval c. Restrictions on Manufacturing, Processing, Distributing, Using, and Disposing d. Prohibition on Commercial Use 2. Intent 3. Defenses C. Penalties X. THE FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE AND RODENTICIDE ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of a FIFRA Offense 1. Violation 2. Intent 3. Defenses C. Penalties XI. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT A. Purpose B. Elements of an ESA Offense 1. Violation 2. Intent 3. Exemptions C. Defenses D. Penalties I. INTRODUCTION
Nine principal statutes (the "statutes") govern the enforcement of federal environmental regulations through criminal prosecution. Section II of this article discusses issues common to most of these statutes, including theories of liability, defenses, and sentencing.
Section III examines the Clean Air Act ("CAA"), (1) which imposes penalties on violators of federal and state air pollution control laws and regulations. Section IV studies the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act" or "CWA"). (2) Sections V and VI address additional water pollution issues discussing, respectively, the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 ("RHA") (3) and the Safe Drinking Water Act ("SDWA"), (4) which together with the CWA restore and protect the quality of the nation's surface and ground waters. Section VII examines the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), (5) which authorizes the cleanup of hazardous substances at contaminated sites and imposes criminal penalties on those who violate its provisions. Section VIII addresses the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), (6) which is a set of amendments reinforcing the Federal Solid Waste Disposal Act ("SWDA"). (7) Section IX reviews the Toxic Substances Control Act ("TSCA"), (8) which governs the manufacture, processing, and distribution or disposal of chemicals that pose a danger to the public or the environment. Section X discusses the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"), (9) which regulates the manufacture, registration, transportation, sale, and use of toxic pesticides. Finally, Section XI examines the efforts of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA") to regulate crimes against wildlife. (10)
Criminal versus Civil Penalties
Over time, Congress has elevated some violations from misdemeanors to felonies and has increased potential jail sentences and fines for those convicted. (11) Most of the statutes enumerated above contain overlapping civil, criminal, and administrative penalty provisions. (12) Because the statutes permit simultaneous civil and criminal enforcement actions against violators, the policy of the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") is to evaluate which method would best address the violation. (13)
The EPA will generally favor a criminal proceeding if complete relief can be achieved criminally, but if remedial measures are necessary, or if the violation is particularly egregious, civil liability may be pursued alone or in conjunction with criminal liability. (14) The Parallel Proceeding Memo outlines the criteria EPA will use to determine how it will proceed. (15)
The criminal provisions of nearly all of the statutes addressed in this article are enforced by the EPA in conjunction with the Department of Justice ("DOJ"). However, the ESA is enforced by the Department of the Interior ("DOI") and the EPA may recommend against prosecution of criminal violations if the violating entity has voluntarily disclosed the violations prior to any EPA-initiated investigation. (16)
In enforcing the environmental statutes, the EPA emphasizes cooperation with other administrative agencies (17) and focuses on select national enforcement priorities that are revised on a bi-annual basis. (18) Since states have the primary responsibility for implementing many federal environmental laws, a significant amount of enforcement activity takes place at the state level and must be coordinated with federal enforcement efforts. (19)
The DOJ's policy provides for a flexible approach to enforcement. In deciding whether to prosecute violations of federal environmental statutes, the department may consider several factors, including: (i) voluntary disclosure; (ii) the degree and timeliness of cooperation; (iii) preventive measures and compliance programs; (iv) pervasive non-compliance; (v) disciplinary systems to punish employees who violate compliance policies; and (vi) subsequent compliance efforts. (20) These factors are intended "to encourage self-auditing, self-policing, and voluntary disclosure of environmental violations." (21)
Interaction with Other Criminal Violations
General criminal statutes can serve as alternative bases for prosecution of environmental crimes. (22) Prosecution of environmental offenses may be pursued under general criminal statutes which provide for harsher penalties than the applicable environmental statute. (23) Prosecutors choosing this path generally append environmental criminal offenses as additional charges.
Overview of Elements of Environmental Criminal Violations
Although criminal provisions vary among statutes, the basic elements of an environmental criminal violation are (i) an act that substantively violates a statute and (ii) an intent to so violate the statute. Common acts that constitute substantive criminal violations include making false statements, (24) failing to file required reports, (25) failing to pay required fees, (26) operating without a permit, (27) and violating the limits or conditions of a permit. (28) Generally, environmental criminal provisions require a mens rea of "knowing." (29) However, the CWA has some criminal provisions for negligent violations. (30) Courts have interpreted the "knowing" element for some CWA violations to mean a defendant need only have knowledge of the discharge of a pollutant. (31)
Each statute includes corporations in its definition of "persons" (32) who may be prosecuted for violations of environmental laws. (33) Corporate liability for environmental crimes is "based on the imputation of agents' or employees' conduct to a corporation, usually through the application of the doctrine of respondeat superior." (34) Corporations may also incur liability for the conduct of their subsidiaries (35) or predecessors. (36) The recent trend is to indict individual corporate officers instead of--or in addition to--the corporation itself for criminal violations of environmental law. (37)
A corporation will generally be held criminally liable for acts committed by an employee acting within the scope of his employment (38) and for the benefit of the corporation, (39) or under certain statutes for directly or indirectly supervising illegal dumping conducted by high-level employees. (40)
Most criminal sanctions under the environmental statutes apply to any "person" who violates a regulation. (41) In the corporate arena, the "responsible corporate officer" doctrine generally imposes individual liability upon those with the responsibility or authority to prevent or correct the violation, (42) rather than those who actually commit the contaminating act. (43)
The degree to which the responsible corporate officer doctrine eliminates the mens rea requirement of various environmental statutes is currently unclear. The First Circuit has held that actual knowledge of the alleged misconduct by the corporation or its employee is required to incur liability under the RCRA. (44) Similarly, the Fifth Circuit requires that officers possess actual knowledge of the facts and law attendant to the violation to incur liability under the CWA. (45) The Third Circuit, assessing CERCLA liability, has required personal participation in the...
|Author:||Shafer, Nathaniel D.|
|Position:||Twenty-Fourth Annual Survey of White Collar Crime|
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP
COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.
COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.