Electricity consumption and economic growth in OPEC countries: a cointegrated panel analysis

Published date01 March 2015
Date01 March 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12038
Electricity consumption and economic
growth in OPEC countries: a cointegrated
panel analysis
Ghahreman Abdoli,* Yazdan Gudarzi Farahani** and
Seyedmasood Dastan***
*Associate Professor in Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran
**PhD student in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Tehran,Shomali Kargar,
1411734115 Tehran,Iran. Email: yazdan.gudarzi@ut.ac.ir
***PhD Student in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Georgia State, Atlanta, GA, USA
Abstract
This paper uses empirical evidence to examine the causality relationship between electricity
consumption and economic growth in OPEC countries by using annual data (1980–2011); this
paper also utilises the panel cointegration and panel-based error correction approach models
and framework. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, most of the studies in this field have
applied the error correction models, auto regressive distributed lag and panel data based on fixed-
effect model in which coefficients obtained by these models cannot be deemed as a general
finding applicable for other countries. The superiority of our article is in applying full modified
ordinary least square estimation method for heterogeneous panels; our study also has stable and
consistent coefficients and is also a dynamic model. Moreover, with regard to previous studies,
our paper includes more countries which increase the reliability of the results. The results indicate
that a long-run relationship exists between real gross domestic product (GDP), electricity con-
sumption and trade activities that involve export and import (control variable). The short-run
results also indicate the importance of electricity consumption to economic growth and vice versa,
supporting the feedback hypothesis which asserts that energy policies oriented towards improve-
ments in electricity consumption efficiency would not adversely affect real GDP. It also apears
that policies for energy efficiency have no statistically significant impact on economic growth in
long run.
1. Introduction
OPEC countries have plentiful and rich energy resources.These countries have appropri-
ate and privileged condition in comparison with many other countries due to existence of
big reservoirs and potential energy resources. These great inputs could be accounted as an
important economic developing factor if they are used in an optimum and appropriate
way; otherwise, the energy section probably acts as an unbalanced and inconsistent part
1
© 2015 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington
Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
according to other economic sections, and this leads to an inappropriate growth of some
sections and consequently causes an unbalanced economic condition.
Accepting the reality of energy’s crucial role in economical development of countries,
it is necessary to preserve energy resources and exploit them accurately and economically.
Hence, it seems necessary to investigate the relation between energy consumption and
produced goods in every country. Is there any relationship between energy consumption
and economic growth?An answer to this question is important because lack of relationship
between production and energy consumption may cause energy dissipation and ineffi-
ciency of energy consumption as a production factor.
The literature concerning the causality relationship between electricity consumption
and economic growth has led to the emergence of four opposite views. One point of
view suggests that if the causality runs from electricity consumption to economic
growth, then electricity conservation policies should be discouraged as it would be
counter-productive. The other point of view suggests that the electricity conservation
policies can only be safely adopted if the causality runs instead from economic growth
to electricity consumption. The third point of view suggests that if there is an existence
of bidirectional causality between the two variables (feedback effect) which implies that
reduction in electricity consumption may adversely affect economic growth and vice
versa, then a different policy approach would be needed (Muhammad and Lean, 2011,
p. 2). The last and fourth approach utilising electricity consumption is neutral to growth.
Therefore, if the neutral hypothesis holds true or if it is proven that there is no causal
relationship between the two variables,therefore such a conclusion would reveal the sur-
prisingly minor role of electricity consumption and its effects in the economic growth of
a country.
The direction of causation between electricity consumption and economic growth has
significant policy implications for energy-dependent countries, enjoying implicit gener-
ous subsidies (low domestic prices) for energy. If, for example, there exists unidirectional
Granger causality running from income to electricity consumption, it may be implied that
electricity conservation policies such as phasing out energy subsidies or elimination of
energy price distortions have little adverse or no effectson economic g rowth.On the other
hand, if unidirectional causality runs from electricity consumption to income, reducing
electricity consumption, for example through bringing domestic energy prices in line with
market prices, could lead to a fall in income or employment.
The direction of causation between electricity consumption and economic growth has
significant policy implications for energy-dependent countries, enjoying implicit gener-
ous subsidies (low domestic prices) for energy. If there is unidirectional causality runs
from economic growth to electricity consumption, it can be implied that increase in
income or economic growth causes increase in electricity consumption, or if there is uni-
directional causality runs from electricity consumption to economic growth, increase in
Ghahreman Abdoli, Yazdan Gudarzi Farahani and Seyedmasood Dastan2
OPEC Energy Review March 2015 © 2015 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT