Electoral Rules, Women’s Representation and the Qualification of Politicians
Author | Paola Profeta,Eleanor F. Woodhouse |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211047414 |
Published date | 01 August 2022 |
Date | 01 August 2022 |
Subject Matter | Articles |
Article
Comparative Political Studies
2022, Vol. 55(9) 1471–1500
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00104140211047414
journals.sagepub.com/home/cps
Electoral Rules,
Women’s
Representation and the
Qualification of
Politicians
Paola Profeta
1
and Eleanor F. Woodhouse
2
Abstract
Proportional electoral rules are associated with more substantial women’s
representation than majoritarian ones. To provide causal evidence that
electoral rules affect women’s representation and the qualification of poli-
ticians, we collect panel data on the universe of Italian politicians from all levels
of government over the period 1987–2013 and analyse an Italian reform
which, in 2005, changed the electoral rule for national elections from (mostly)
majoritarian to proportional, but did not affect subnational level elections. We
find that this reform increased the number of women elected by 5%, while not
decreasing the overall qualification levels of politicians, measured by the level
of education and political experience. We provide evidence that the highest
qualification women are not elected and that the overall qualification of
elected politicians could have increased (rather than remain constant) if the
best women candidates had been elected.
Keywords
electoral reforms, women’s political representation, difference-in-differences
1
Bocconi University, Milano, Italy
2
University College London, UK
Corresponding Author:
Paola Profeta, Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1,
Milano 20136, Italy.
Email: paola.profeta@unibocconi.it
Introduction
Women are still under-represented on the political stage across the globe.
According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union database, only 11 countries out of
193 have more than 40% of women in their national parliaments and 121
countries have less than 25% women’s representation (Inter-Parliamentary
Union, 2017). Not a single OECD country has yet reached gender parity in its
national parliament: the highest is Mexico with 48.2% of women and the
OECD average remains at 30.1% (OECD, 2019). However, the presence of
women in politics matters, not only for descriptive representation but also for
substantive representation, especially in terms of effectively voicing
‘women’s interests’and influencing policy outcomes (see a recent review in
Hessami and Lopes da Fonseca (2020)). Existing research has linked the
under-representation of women to voter bias (Fr´
echette et al., 2008;Dolan,
2014,2018;Dolan & Lynch, 2016;Hayes & Lawless, 2016;Le Barbanchon
& Sauvagnat, forthcoming), party bias (Norris & Lovenduski, 1993;Fox &
Lawless, 2010;Lawless & Fox, 2010) and political competition (Folke &
Rickne, 2016).
Electoral rules have also been shown to matter, mainly because propor-
tional systems tend to favour the election of women with respect to major-
itarian ones (Rule, 1987). In parallel, electoral rules have been shown to
influence the qualification of elected politicians: in majoritarian systems,
tougher political races are associated with higher qualification levels of elected
politicians, measured by the level of education, as opposed to proportional
systems (Galasso and Nannicini, 2011). Proportional systems seem unable to
elect the best candidates.
However, as women’s representation is positively related to the qualifi-
cation of politicians (Baltrunaite et al., 2014), because women candidates have
been found, overwhelmingly, to be as or more qualified than their male
counterparts (Murray, 2010;2012;Franceschet and Piscopo, 2013;O’Brien
and Rickne, 2016;Barnes and Holman, 2019), their increased representation
in proportional systems may counterbalance the negative selection effect
associated with proportional rules. Thus, the overall qualification levels of
politicians may remain equal or even increase with respect to those char-
acterising a majoritarian system.
To provide evidence of these effects, we assemble data on the universe of
Italian politicians from all levels of government –national, regional, pro-
vincial, and municipal –over the period 1987–2013. We exploit the existence
of different electoral rules across levels of government to form our research
design: in 2005, a reform was introduced which changed the electoral rule for
national elections from a mixed-member system –whereby 75% of repre-
sentatives were elected via a majoritarian system and 25% via a proportional
system –to a closed list proportional rule with a majority bonus. Since the
1472 Comparative Political Studies 55(9)
To continue reading
Request your trial